Skip to main content
EVOKORE// BROWSE
>

./browse/prompts

53 NODES
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

ARCH-AEP Tiered Remediation Cycle

Run a scope-locked remediation cycle that normalizes findings, revalidates them in parallel, and clears tiers with verification evidence.

architecture
⭐1
# ARCH-AEP Tiered Remediation Cycle Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when you need an orchestrated engineering review cycle with strict scope lock, tiered execution, and audit-grade evidence. ## Use this when - Large remediation efforts spanning multiple PRs - Parallel specialist review with shared backlog authority - Tracking verification evidence through closure ## Expected outcomes - Scope changes are controlled instead of creeping mid-cycle - Severity tiers drive remediation order predictably - Verification evidence is treated as part of done ## Source synthesis - CHELATEDAI/docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/workflow.md (https://github.com/mattmre/CHELATEDAI/blob/main/docs/ARCH%20AGENTIC%20ENGINEERING%20AND%20PLANNING/workflow.md) - CHELATEDAI/docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/orchestrator-briefing.md (https://github.com/mattmre/CHELATEDAI/blob/main/docs/ARCH%20AGENTIC%20ENGINEERING%20AND%20PLANNING/orchestrator-briefing.md) ## Dedupe notes Condenses the core ARCH-AEP workflow and briefing docs into a single remediation-cycle entry instead of importing both separately. ## Source excerpts ### CHELATEDAI/docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/workflow.md ## Workflow (ARCH phase) 1. Scope lock - Define PR range and time window. - Freeze inputs (refinement report + framework + PR list). 2. Discovery + normalization - Orchestrator ingests `agentic-review-framework.md` and the latest refinement report. - Normalize all findings into a single backlog with unique IDs. - De-duplicate, merge overlaps, and assign provisional severity. - Record backlog in `docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/backlog-YYYY-MM-DD.md`. 3. Parallel re-validation - Spawn specialist agents to re-validate findings against current main. - Each agent must attach exact file paths and line ranges. - Propose the smallest safe fix, acceptance criteria, and effort sizing (S/M/L). 4. Architecture and planning synthesis - Orchestrator merges validated findings into a master backlog. - Re-score and re-rank using the sorting model. - Identify dependency chains and blockers. ### CHELATEDAI/docs/ARCH AGENTIC ENGINEERING AND PLANNING/orchestrator-briefing.md Purpose: Quick reference for the ARCH-AEP documentation set, plus the narrative to start a new session. Full file index: `docs/INDEX.md` ## What Exists In This Folder - `README.md`: narrative overview and intent for ARCH-AEP. - `workflow.md`: end-to-end workflow specification with phases, guardrails, and enhancements. - `templates.md`: ID and branch conventions, tracker table format, and status log. - `backlog-template.md`: template for the master backlog file. - `backlog-index.md`: index of backlog files. - `next-session.md`: short handoff checklist for resuming work. - `phase-planning.md`: long-running planning record for the current cycle. - `schedule-and-tracking.md`: cadence, gates, and milestone tracking. - `agent-learning.md`: cross-session learnings and reusable patterns. - `change-log.md`: scope/defer decisions with audit context. - `risk-memo-template.md`: Critical/High risk memo template. - `risk-memos/README.md`: storage location for risk memos. - `phase-summary-template.md`: template for per-PR or per-phase summaries. - `phase-summaries/README.md`: storage location for phase summaries. - `verification-log.md`: test/build evidence mirror for PRs. - `tracker-pointer.md`: pointer to the active tracker file. - `tracker-index.md`: index of tracker files. - `scope-lock-t ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

Submodule Hygiene Workflow

Add, update, validate, document, and review git submodule changes without losing track of dependency state.

productivity
⭐1
# Submodule Hygiene Workflow Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when repositories rely on submodules and you need a disciplined way to update them safely. ## Use this when - Adding or updating repository submodules - Documenting submodule changes alongside code changes - Avoiding broken references during review ## Expected outcomes - Submodule changes are treated as a documented workflow - Validation happens before the review handoff - Dependency movement stays visible to the team ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/SUBMODULE_WORKFLOW.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/SUBMODULE_WORKFLOW.md) ## Dedupe notes Uses the dedicated submodule workflow doc because the guidance is operationally specific and not already represented on the site. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/SUBMODULE_WORKFLOW.md This repository may consume external content through git submodules. Use this workflow to keep documentation updates reviewable and predictable. ## 1) Add or Register a Submodule ```bash git submodule add <repo-url> <target-path> git submodule update --init --recursive ``` Commit both: - `.gitmodules` - the submodule pointer change at `<target-path>` ## 2) Pull Latest Submodule Content ```bash git submodule update --remote --merge git submodule update --init --recursive ``` Then inspect: ```bash git status git diff --submodule ``` ## 3) Validate Submodule Cleanliness (Local + CI) Run the same guard used in CI before opening your PR: ```bash git submodule status --recursive node scripts/validate-submodule-cleanliness.js ``` Cleanliness semantics: - `-` => uninitialized submodule - `+` => submodule commit mismatch (worktree vs gitlink pointer) - `U` => submodule merge conflict - dirty submodule worktree => non-empty `git -C <submodule> status --porcelain` Submodule paths can include spaces (for example `SKILLS/ANTHROPIC COOKBOOK`), so always quote path arguments when running manual `git -C` commands. ## 4) Update Docs in This Repo When a submodule changes behavior, update: - `docs/README.md` if canonical links changed - `docs/USAGE.md` / `docs/TROUBLESHOOTING.md` if runtime guidance changed - `README.md` / `CONTRIBUTING.md` if contributor workflow changed ## 5) PR Expectations For submodule-related PRs: 1. Commit inside the submodule first. 2. Return to the parent repo and verify `git submodule status` has no unexpected `-dirty` entries. 3. Commit the updated submodule pointer in the parent repository. 4. Include any matching docs updates in this repository. 5. Mention the upstream submodule commit SHA in the PR description.
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

PR Merge Boundary Validation Runbook

Validate chained pull requests at each merge boundary with explicit checks, stale-approval handling, and rollback awareness.

devops
⭐1
# PR Merge Boundary Validation Runbook Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this runbook when a merge sequence spans dependent pull requests and each boundary needs fresh validation. ## Use this when - Managing dependency-chained pull requests - Refreshing stale approvals near merge time - Reducing merge surprises through checkpoint validation ## Expected outcomes - Each merge boundary has a concrete verification step - Review freshness stays visible as branches evolve - Rollback planning is captured before the merge happens ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/PR_MERGE_RUNBOOK.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/PR_MERGE_RUNBOOK.md) ## Dedupe notes Keeps the merge-boundary validation concept separate from more general workflow or orchestration docs. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/PR_MERGE_RUNBOOK.md Operator runbook for reliable merges and context-rot prevention. ## Pre-merge Checklist - [ ] PR scope matches approved plan - [ ] PR description is filled using `.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md` - [ ] PR metadata automation check (`scripts/validate-pr-metadata.js`) is passing for pull_request CI runs - [ ] Required tests pass locally/CI - [ ] Docs updated for user-facing behavior changes - [ ] Release-impacting changes called out - [ ] Follow-up issues captured (if any) ## Required Checks by Change Type Use this as the minimum check set before approval and merge: | Change type | Required checks | | --- | --- | | Docs-only changes | `node test-docs-canonical-links.js` | | Ops/docs process changes (`docs/PR_MERGE_RUNBOOK.md`, `next-session.md`, orchestration docs) | `node test-ops-docs-validation.js` and `node test-docs-canonical-links.js` | | Source/tooling/config changes (`src/`, `scripts/`, workflow/config files) | Relevant targeted tests for touched area plus CI-required suite | | Release-flow changes | `node test-npm-release-flow-validation.js` plus docs/link checks | If a PR spans multiple change types, run the union of required checks. ## Reviewer Responsibilities - Confirm PR scope and dependency assumptions are explicit in description. - Confirm PR metadata fields from `.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md` are complete. - Verify required checks for each change type are attached in PR evidence. - Block approval if dependency base PR is not merged or branch is stale. - Approve only the current chain head; do not pre-approve non-head dependent PRs. - Confirm all review conversations are resolved before final approval. - Ensure merge strategy and rollback notes are documented for risky changes. ## Merge Steps 1. Rebase or update branch with latest target branch. 2. Re-run required validations. 3. Confirm reviewer approvals and resolved conversations. 4. Merge via approved strategy. 5. Record merge commit/PR number in tracker. ## Merge-boundary Checkpoints At every dependency merge boundary (`base -> dependent`): 1. Rebase dependent PR branch on latest `main` immediately after parent merge. 2. Re-run required checks and attach updated evidence in PR metadata. 3. Revalidate approvals for the new head state (stale approvals must be refreshed). 4. Confirm merge-boundary revalidation notes are updated before merge. ## Merge-order Controls (Dependency Chain) 1. Define merge order explicitly in PR descriptions (`base -> dependent`). 2. Merge only the current chain head; hold dependents until parent merge is complete. 3. After each merge, rebase ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern

Aggregate tools across multiple MCP child servers with prefixing, collision avoidance, and routing rules that stay deterministic.

architecture
⭐1
# Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this pattern when an MCP host must broker tools from multiple child servers without sacrificing clarity or control. ## Use this when - Combining tools from several MCP backends - Avoiding tool-name collisions across providers - Keeping origin and routing visible during execution ## Expected outcomes - Server-prefixed names make tool origins obvious - Collisions are avoided without brittle manual renaming - Operators can extend the tool surface without losing determinism ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md) - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md) ## Dedupe notes Uses the improvement-transfer doc as the primary source, with the discovery doc covering prefixing and compatibility details. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md > **Purpose**: Feed this file into Claude Code CLI when working on the Agent33 repo. It contains patterns, architectures, and capabilities proven in EVOKORE-MCP that Agent33 should adopt. --- ## 1. Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern **What Agent33 lacks**: Agent33's MCP server (Phase 43) is a single-endpoint bridge. It doesn't aggregate multiple child MCP servers behind a unified namespace. **What to build**: A proxy layer that spawns and manages multiple child MCP servers from a single config file, presenting them as one unified tool surface. ### Implementation spec: ``` mcp.config.json { "servers": { "github": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-github"], "env": { "GITHUB_TOKEN": "${GITHUB_TOKEN}" } }, "fs": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "./"] }, "elevenlabs": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["elevenlabs-mcp"], "env": { "ELEVENLABS_API_KEY": "${ELEVENLABS_API_KEY}" } } } } ``` **Key patterns from EVOKORE**: - **Tool name prefixing**: Every proxied tool gets renamed `{serverId}_{originalName}` to prevent namespace collisions (e.g., `github_create_issue`, `fs_read_file`). First-registration-wins for duplicates. - **Environment interpolation**: `${VAR}` syntax in `env` blocks resolved ... ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md This page explains how EVOKORE presents tools, how proxy names are built, and how `discover_tools` changes the visible tool surface. ## Two tool populations ### Native EVOKORE tools These tools are defined by EVOKORE itself: - `docs_architect` - `skill_creator` - `resolve_workflow` - `search_skills` - `get_skill_help` - `discover_tools` Properties: - always available - always visible - not subject to proxy prefixing ### Proxied child-server tools These come from child servers in `mcp.config.json`. Current configured sources: - `github` - `fs` - optional `elevenlabs` Properties: - fetched from child servers at startup - renamed with server prefixes - governed by `permissions.yml` - routed through `ProxyManager` ## Prefixing and compatibility EVOKORE rewrites proxied tool names to: ```text ${serverId}_${tool.name} ``` Why this exists: - prevents tool-name collisions across child servers - makes origin obvious during execution and review - keeps exact-name routing deterministic Examples: | Upstream tool | EVOKORE-exposed tool | |---|---| | `read_file` from `fs` | `fs_read_file` | | `create_issue` from `github` | `github_create_issue` | ### Duplicate-prefixed name policy If two child registrations would create the same final prefixed name: - the first registrati ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Human-in-the-Loop Approval Token Workflow

Gate risky tool execution behind approval tokens so agents can retry safely after a human reviewer signs off.

security
⭐1
# Human-in-the-Loop Approval Token Workflow Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when autonomous execution needs a durable handoff from human review back into the agent loop. ## Use this when - Retrying a blocked tool call after approval - Adding a human checkpoint to sensitive actions - Reducing insecure workarounds around approval flows ## Expected outcomes - Approval becomes a reusable tokenized workflow - Agents resume work without losing execution context - Security controls stay explicit instead of being implied ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/V2_MULTI_AGENT_WORKFLOWS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/V2_MULTI_AGENT_WORKFLOWS.md) - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md) ## Dedupe notes Synthesizes the approval-token concept from the main workflow doc and the Agent33 improvement transfer notes. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/V2_MULTI_AGENT_WORKFLOWS.md With EVOKORE-MCP v2.0 fully operational, we can now leverage 40+ proxied GitHub and Filesystem tools seamlessly within complex multi-agent workflows. The core architectural advancements include: ## 1. Dynamic Tool Prefixing & Indexing Instead of loading 40+ tools into an LLM's context window statically (which causes massive bloat), EVOKORE's `ProxyManager` boots child servers (like `@modelcontextprotocol/server-github` and `@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem`) and dynamically prefixes their tools (`github_create_issue`, `fs_write_file`). This prevents namespace collisions while keeping the tools accessible to native skills. ## 2. Human-in-the-Loop (HITL) Security Interceptor Automated multi-agent workflows involving sensitive endpoints (like GitHub write access or file deletion) are governed by EVOKORE's stateless `_evokore_approval_token` architecture. - When an agent attempts a restricted action, the tool call is intercepted and blocked. - The server returns an error explicitly commanding the agent to prompt the human for approval. - Upon approval, the agent retries the exact tool call with the injected token, securely fulfilling the workflow without severing the conversational context. ## 3. Active Skill Orchestration (Native Harnessing) Unlike v1.0 where skills merel ... ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/AGENT33_IMPROVEMENT_INSTRUCTIONS.md > **Purpose**: Feed this file into Claude Code CLI when working on the Agent33 repo. It contains patterns, architectures, and capabilities proven in EVOKORE-MCP that Agent33 should adopt. --- ## 1. Multi-Server MCP Aggregation Pattern **What Agent33 lacks**: Agent33's MCP server (Phase 43) is a single-endpoint bridge. It doesn't aggregate multiple child MCP servers behind a unified namespace. **What to build**: A proxy layer that spawns and manages multiple child MCP servers from a single config file, presenting them as one unified tool surface. ### Implementation spec: ``` mcp.config.json { "servers": { "github": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-github"], "env": { "GITHUB_TOKEN": "${GITHUB_TOKEN}" } }, "fs": { "command": "npx", "args": ["-y", "@modelcontextprotocol/server-filesystem", "./"] }, "elevenlabs": { "command": "uvx", "args": ["elevenlabs-mcp"], "env": { "ELEVENLABS_API_KEY": "${ELEVENLABS_API_KEY}" } } } } ``` **Key patterns from EVOKORE**: - **Tool name prefixing**: Every proxied tool gets renamed `{serverId}_{originalName}` to prevent namespace collisions (e.g., `github_create_issue`, `fs_read_file`). First-registration-wins for duplicates. - **Environment interpolation**: `${VAR}` syntax in `env` blocks resolved ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’6 months ago

Dynamic Tool Discovery and Session Activation

Expose only native tools at session start, then activate proxied tools on demand through a searchable discovery layer.

architecture
⭐1
# Dynamic Tool Discovery and Session Activation Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this skill when you need smaller tool payloads, exact-name compatibility, and session-scoped tool activation. ## Use this when - Reducing tool-list bloat for focused sessions - Preserving exact-name tool calls while hiding noise - Activating proxied tools only when a task requires them ## Expected outcomes - Discovery changes listing visibility without breaking routing - Session-scoped activation keeps tools relevant to the task - Operators can trade compatibility against payload size intentionally ## Source synthesis - EVOKORE-MCP/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md (https://github.com/mattmre/EVOKORE-MCP/blob/main/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md) ## Dedupe notes Uses the canonical EVOKORE-MCP discovery doc instead of duplicating the same concept from walkthrough and migration docs. ## Source excerpts ### EVOKORE-MCP/docs/TOOLS_AND_DISCOVERY.md This page explains how EVOKORE presents tools, how proxy names are built, and how `discover_tools` changes the visible tool surface. ## Two tool populations ### Native EVOKORE tools These tools are defined by EVOKORE itself: - `docs_architect` - `skill_creator` - `resolve_workflow` - `search_skills` - `get_skill_help` - `discover_tools` Properties: - always available - always visible - not subject to proxy prefixing ### Proxied child-server tools These come from child servers in `mcp.config.json`. Current configured sources: - `github` - `fs` - optional `elevenlabs` Properties: - fetched from child servers at startup - renamed with server prefixes - governed by `permissions.yml` - routed through `ProxyManager` ## Prefixing and compatibility EVOKORE rewrites proxied tool names to: ```text ${serverId}_${tool.name} ``` Why this exists: - prevents tool-name collisions across child servers - makes origin obvious during execution and review - keeps exact-name routing deterministic Examples: | Upstream tool | EVOKORE-exposed tool | |---|---| | `read_file` from `fs` | `fs_read_file` | | `create_issue` from `github` | `github_create_issue` | ### Duplicate-prefixed name policy If two child registrations would create the same final prefixed name: - the first registration wins - later duplicates are skipped - EVOKORE logs a warning and duplicate summary ## Discovery modes | Mode | What `tools/list` returns | Best for | |---|---|---| | `legacy` | all native + proxied tools | maximum compatibility | | `dynamic` | native tools + session-activated proxied tools | smaller initial tool payloads | Environment toggle: ```bash EVOKORE_TOOL_DISCOVERY_MODE=legacy EVOKORE_TOOL_DISCOVERY_MODE=dynamic ``` ## Dynamic discovery lifecycle In `dynamic` mode, EVOKORE uses a session-scoped activation set. Lifecycle: 1. session starts with only native tools visible 2. user/model calls `discover_tools` 3. `ToolCatalogIndex` searches the merged native + proxied catalog 4. matching proxied tools are activated for that session 5. EVOKORE emits `sendToolListChanged()` best-effort 6. client re-runs `tools/list` or auto-refreshes ```mermaid flowchart TD A[Session starts in dynamic mode] --> B[tools/list shows native tools] B --> C[discover_tools query] C --> D[ToolCatalogIndex searches merged catalog] D --> E[Matching proxied tools added to session activation set] E --> F[sendToolListChanged best-effort] F --> G[Client refreshes tools/list] G --> H[Activated proxied tools now visible] D --> I[Exact-name proxied call still works eve ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

Improvement Cycle Review Wizard

Run a live improvement-cycle workflow that links review artifacts, approvals, tool requests, and operator checkpoints.

productivity
⭐1
# Improvement Cycle Review Wizard Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when an operator needs a guided improvement cycle with live status, explicit approvals, and linked artifacts. ## Use this when - Operational review sessions with live progress - Approval-heavy improvement cycles - Coordinating review artifacts with execution steps ## Expected outcomes - Live workflow execution remains visible to operators - Artifacts, approvals, and tool requests stay connected - Improvement loops become easier to audit and rerun ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md) - AGENT33/docs/operator-improvement-cycle-and-jupyter.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/operator-improvement-cycle-and-jupyter.md) ## Dedupe notes Merges AGENT33 live review walkthrough details with the shorter operator-focused improvement-cycle guide. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md This guide documents the operator flow introduced by the Phase 25 live workflow transport and the Phase 26/27 improvement-cycle review wizard stack. ## Scope - Live workflow execution with run-scoped graph refresh - WebSocket-first status streaming with authenticated SSE fallback - Improvement-cycle preset creation - Explanation artifact generation for `plan_review` and `diff_review` - Linked review creation, risk assessment, L1/L2 signoff, and final approval - Pending tool-approval triage inside the same workflow domain > Note > This walkthrough reflects the review stack built on `codex/session58-phase26-wizard` and validated in `codex/session60-phase22-docs-validation`. If the related PRs are still open, `main` may not yet expose every surface described here. ## Operator Flow ```mermaid sequenceDiagram participant UI as "Frontend Control Plane" participant WF as "Workflow APIs" participant VIZ as "Visualization APIs" participant EXP as "Explanation APIs" participant REV as "Review APIs" participant HITL as "Tool Approval APIs" UI->>WF: "POST /v1/workflows/{name}/execute (single mode, caller run_id)" UI->>VIZ: "GET /v1/visualizations/workflows/{workflow_id}/graph?run_id=..." UI->>WF: "WS /v1/workflows/{run_id}/ws" alt "WebSocket unav ... ### AGENT33/docs/operator-improvement-cycle-and-jupyter.md This guide covers the merged operator surfaces for: - the Phase 26 improvement-cycle review wizard - the Phase 27 canonical workflow presets - the Phase 38 Docker-backed Jupyter kernel workflow Use it when you want the shortest current path from UI entry point to a real workflow run. ## 1. Improvement-Cycle Wizard The wizard is mounted inside the frontend control plane under the `Workflows` domain. ### Entry path 1. Open the frontend at `http://localhost:3000` 2. Authenticate with a bearer token or API key 3. Open `Advanced Settings` 4. Select the `Workflows` domain 5. Use the `Improvement Cycle Wizard` panel at the top of the page ### What the wizard does The wizard stitches together the backend surfaces that previously had to be called manually: - plan review / diff review generation - review creation and risk assessment - L1 and L2 review submission - tool approval request review and decision capture Reference implementation: - frontend: `frontend/src/features/improvement-cycle/ImprovementCycleWizard.tsx` - tests: `frontend/src/features/improvement-cycle/ImprovementCycleWizard.test.tsx` For the detailed review flow, keep using: - [`phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md`](phase25-26-live-review-walkthrough.md) ## 2. Canonical Workflow Presets The `Workflows` doma ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ“textβ€’6 months ago

Guardrailed Code Review Pipeline

Run a staged code review workflow with explicit risk assessment, reviewer handoffs, and merge gates.

coding
⭐1
# Guardrailed Code Review Pipeline Imported from curated first-party documentation sources. ## What this covers Use this workflow when a change needs structured review evidence, clear approval stages, and a rollback-aware path to merge. ## Use this when - Multi-step L1 and L2 review signoff - High-risk changes that need audit trails - Standardizing reviewer decisions before merge ## Expected outcomes - Review states and approval checkpoints stay explicit - Risk assessment and evidence are captured before merge - The workflow remains small enough to reuse across repositories ## Source synthesis - AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md) - AGENT33/docs/walkthroughs.md (https://github.com/mattmre/AGENT33/blob/main/docs/walkthroughs.md) ## Dedupe notes Combines AGENT33 lifecycle mapping and operator walkthrough material into one review-oriented site entry. ## Source excerpts ### AGENT33/docs/functionality-and-workflows.md ### 4.1 Review Lifecycle States: - `draft -> ready -> l1-review -> l1-approved -> (optional l2-review -> l2-approved) -> approved -> merged` Main APIs: - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assess` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assign-l1` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/l1` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/assign-l2` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/l2` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/approve` - `/v1/reviews/{id}/merge` ### AGENT33/docs/walkthroughs.md ## 4. Review Lifecycle (Two-Layer Signoff) Create review: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/ \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"task_id":"TASK-101","branch":"feat/docs-refresh","pr_number":12}' ``` Assess risk: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assess \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"triggers":["api-public","security"]}' ``` Move to ready and assign L1: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/ready -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assign-l1 -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" ``` Submit L1 decision: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/l1 \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"decision":"approved","issues":[],"comments":"L1 pass"}' ``` If L2 required, continue: ```bash curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/assign-l2 -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" curl -X POST http://localhost:8000/v1/reviews/<review_id>/l2 \ -H "Authorization: Bearer $TOKEN" \ -H "Content-Type: application/json" \ -d '{"decision":"approved","issues":[],"commen ...
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
docs
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

task-coordination-strategies

Decompose complex tasks, design dependency graphs, and coordinate

coding
⭐1
# Task Coordination Strategies Strategies for decomposing complex tasks into parallelizable units, designing dependency graphs, writing effective task descriptions, and monitoring workload across agent teams. ## When to Use This Skill - Breaking down a complex task for parallel execution - Designing task dependency relationships (blockedBy/blocks) - Writing task descriptions with clear acceptance criteria - Monitoring and rebalancing workload across teammates - Identifying the critical path in a multi-task workflow ## Task Decomposition Strategies ### By Layer Split work by architectural layer: - Frontend components - Backend API endpoints - Database migrations/models - Test suites **Best for**: Full-stack features, vertical slices ### By Component Split work by functional component: - Authentication module - User profile module - Notification module **Best for**: Microservices, modular architectures ### By Concern Split work by cross-cutting concern: - Security review - Performance review - Architecture review **Best for**: Code reviews, audits ### By File Ownership Split work by file/directory boundaries: - `src/components/` β€” Implementer 1 - `src/api/` β€” Implementer 2 - `src/utils/` β€” Implementer 3 **Best for**: Parallel implementation, conflict avoidance ## Dependency Graph Design ### Principles 1. **Minimize chain depth** β€” Prefer wide, shallow graphs over deep chains 2. **Identify the critical path** β€” The longest chain determines minimum completion time 3. **Use blockedBy sparingly** β€” Only add dependencies that are truly required 4. **Avoid circular dependencies** β€” Task A blocks B blocks A is a deadlock ### Patterns **Independent (Best parallelism)**: ``` Task A ─┐ Task B ─┼─→ Integration Task C β”€β”˜ ``` **Sequential (Necessary dependencies)**: ``` Task A β†’ Task B β†’ Task C ``` **Diamond (Mixed)**: ``` β”Œβ†’ Task B ─┐ Task A ── β”œβ†’ Task D β””β†’ Task C β”€β”˜ ``` ### Using blockedBy/blocks ``` TaskCreate: { subject: "Build API endpoints" } β†’ Task #1 TaskCreate: { subject: "Build frontend components" } β†’ Task #2 TaskCreate: { subject: "Integration testing" } β†’ Task #3 TaskUpdate: { taskId: "3", addBlockedBy: ["1", "2"] } β†’ #3 waits for #1 and #2 ``` ## Task Description Best Practices Every task should include: 1. **Objective** β€” What needs to be accomplished (1-2 sentences) 2. **Owned Files** β€” Explicit list of files/directories this teammate may modify 3. **Requirements** β€” Specific deliverables or behaviors expected 4. **Interface Contracts** β€” How this work connects to other teammates' work 5. **Acceptance Criteria** β€” How to verify the task is done correctly 6. **Scope Boundaries** β€” What is explicitly out of scope ### Template ``` ## Objective Build the user authentication API endpoints. ## Owned Files - src/api/auth.ts - src/api/middleware/auth-middleware.ts - src/types/auth.ts (shared β€” read only, do not modify) ## Requirements - POST /api/login β€” accepts email/password, returns JWT - POST /api/register β€” creates new user, returns JWT - GET /api/me β€” returns current user profile (requires auth) ## Interface Contract - Import User type from src/types/auth.ts (owned by implementer-1) - Export AuthResponse type for frontend consumption ## Acceptance Criteria - All endpoints return proper HTTP status codes - JWT tokens expire after 24 hours - Passwords are hashed with bcrypt ## Out of Scope - OAuth/social login - Password reset flow - Rate limiting ``` ## Workload Monitoring ### Indicators of Imbalance | Signal | Meaning | Action | | -------------------------- | ------------------- | --------------------------- | | Teammate idle, others busy | Uneven distribution | Reassign pending tasks | | Teammate stuck on one task | Possible blocker | Check in, offer help | | All tasks blocked | Dependency issue | Resolve critical path first | | One teammate has 3x others | Overloaded | Split tasks or reassign | ### Rebalancing Steps 1. Call `TaskList` to assess current state 2. Identify idle or overloaded teammates 3. Use `TaskUpdate` to reassign tasks 4. Use `SendMessage` to notify affected teammates 5. Monitor for improved throughput
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

team-communication-protocols

Structured messaging protocols for agent team communication

coding
⭐1
# Team Communication Protocols Protocols for effective communication between agent teammates, including message type selection, plan approval workflows, shutdown procedures, and common anti-patterns to avoid. ## When to Use This Skill - Establishing communication norms for a new team - Choosing between message types (message, broadcast, shutdown_request) - Handling plan approval workflows - Managing graceful team shutdown - Discovering teammate identities and capabilities ## Message Type Selection ### `message` (Direct Message) β€” Default Choice Send to a single specific teammate: ```json { "type": "message", "recipient": "implementer-1", "content": "Your API endpoint is ready. You can now build the frontend form.", "summary": "API endpoint ready for frontend" } ``` **Use for**: Task updates, coordination, questions, integration notifications. ### `broadcast` β€” Use Sparingly Send to ALL teammates simultaneously: ```json { "type": "broadcast", "content": "Critical: shared types file has been updated. Pull latest before continuing.", "summary": "Shared types updated" } ``` **Use ONLY for**: Critical blockers affecting everyone, major changes to shared resources. **Why sparingly?**: Each broadcast sends N separate messages (one per teammate), consuming API resources proportional to team size. ### `shutdown_request` β€” Graceful Termination Request a teammate to shut down: ```json { "type": "shutdown_request", "recipient": "reviewer-1", "content": "Review complete, shutting down team." } ``` The teammate responds with `shutdown_response` (approve or reject with reason). ## Communication Anti-Patterns | Anti-Pattern | Problem | Better Approach | | --------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------- | -------------------------------------- | | Broadcasting routine updates | Wastes resources, noise | Direct message to affected teammate | | Sending JSON status messages | Not designed for structured data | Use TaskUpdate to update task status | | Not communicating at integration points | Teammates build against stale interfaces | Message when your interface is ready | | Micromanaging via messages | Overwhelms teammates, slows work | Check in at milestones, not every step | | Using UUIDs instead of names | Hard to read, error-prone | Always use teammate names | | Ignoring idle teammates | Wasted capacity | Assign new work or shut down | ## Plan Approval Workflow When a teammate is spawned with `plan_mode_required`: 1. Teammate creates a plan using read-only exploration tools 2. Teammate calls `ExitPlanMode` which sends a `plan_approval_request` to the lead 3. Lead reviews the plan 4. Lead responds with `plan_approval_response`: **Approve**: ```json { "type": "plan_approval_response", "request_id": "abc-123", "recipient": "implementer-1", "approve": true } ``` **Reject with feedback**: ```json { "type": "plan_approval_response", "request_id": "abc-123", "recipient": "implementer-1", "approve": false, "content": "Please add error handling for the API calls" } ``` ## Shutdown Protocol ### Graceful Shutdown Sequence 1. **Lead sends shutdown_request** to each teammate 2. **Teammate receives request** as a JSON message with `type: "shutdown_request"` 3. **Teammate responds** with `shutdown_response`: - `approve: true` β€” Teammate saves state and exits - `approve: false` + reason β€” Teammate continues working 4. **Lead handles rejections** β€” Wait for teammate to finish, then retry 5. **After all teammates shut down** β€” Call `Teammate` cleanup ### Handling Rejections If a teammate rejects shutdown: - Check their reason (usually "still working on task") - Wait for their current task to complete - Retry shutdown request - If urgent, user can force shutdown ## Teammate Discovery Find team members by reading the config file: **Location**: `~/.claude/teams/{team-name}/config.json` **Structure**: ```json { "members": [ { "name": "security-reviewer", "agentId": "uuid-here", "agentType": "team-reviewer" }, { "name": "perf-reviewer", "agentId": "uuid-here", "agentType": "team-reviewer" } ] } ``` **Always use `name`** for messaging and task assignment. Never use `agentId` directly.
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

team-composition-patterns

Design optimal agent team compositions with sizing heuristics,

coding
⭐1
# Team Composition Patterns Best practices for composing multi-agent teams, selecting team sizes, choosing agent types, and configuring display modes for Claude Code's Agent Teams feature. ## When to Use This Skill - Deciding how many teammates to spawn for a task - Choosing between preset team configurations - Selecting the right agent type (subagent_type) for each role - Configuring teammate display modes (tmux, iTerm2, in-process) - Building custom team compositions for non-standard workflows ## Team Sizing Heuristics | Complexity | Team Size | When to Use | | ------------ | --------- | ----------------------------------------------------------- | | Simple | 1-2 | Single-dimension review, isolated bug, small feature | | Moderate | 2-3 | Multi-file changes, 2-3 concerns, medium features | | Complex | 3-4 | Cross-cutting concerns, large features, deep debugging | | Very Complex | 4-5 | Full-stack features, comprehensive reviews, systemic issues | **Rule of thumb**: Start with the smallest team that covers all required dimensions. Adding teammates increases coordination overhead. ## Preset Team Compositions ### Review Team - **Size**: 3 reviewers - **Agents**: 3x `team-reviewer` - **Default dimensions**: security, performance, architecture - **Use when**: Code changes need multi-dimensional quality assessment ### Debug Team - **Size**: 3 investigators - **Agents**: 3x `team-debugger` - **Default hypotheses**: 3 competing hypotheses - **Use when**: Bug has multiple plausible root causes ### Feature Team - **Size**: 3 (1 lead + 2 implementers) - **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 2x `team-implementer` - **Use when**: Feature can be decomposed into parallel work streams ### Fullstack Team - **Size**: 4 (1 lead + 3 implementers) - **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 1x frontend `team-implementer` + 1x backend `team-implementer` + 1x test `team-implementer` - **Use when**: Feature spans frontend, backend, and test layers ### Research Team - **Size**: 3 researchers - **Agents**: 3x `general-purpose` - **Default areas**: Each assigned a different research question, module, or topic - **Capabilities**: Codebase search (Grep, Glob, Read), web search (WebSearch, WebFetch) - **Use when**: Need to understand a codebase, research libraries, compare approaches, or gather information from code and web sources in parallel ### Security Team - **Size**: 4 reviewers - **Agents**: 4x `team-reviewer` - **Default dimensions**: OWASP/vulnerabilities, auth/access control, dependencies/supply chain, secrets/configuration - **Use when**: Comprehensive security audit covering multiple attack surfaces ### Migration Team - **Size**: 4 (1 lead + 2 implementers + 1 reviewer) - **Agents**: 1x `team-lead` + 2x `team-implementer` + 1x `team-reviewer` - **Use when**: Large codebase migration (framework upgrade, language port, API version bump) requiring parallel work with correctness verification ## Agent Type Selection When spawning teammates with the Task tool, choose `subagent_type` based on what tools the teammate needs: | Agent Type | Tools Available | Use For | | ------------------------------ | ----------------------------------------- | ---------------------------------------------------------- | | `general-purpose` | All tools (Read, Write, Edit, Bash, etc.) | Implementation, debugging, any task requiring file changes | | `Explore` | Read-only tools (Read, Grep, Glob) | Research, code exploration, analysis | | `Plan` | Read-only tools | Architecture planning, task decomposition | | `agent-teams:team-reviewer` | All tools | Code review with structured findings | | `agent-teams:team-debugger` | All tools | Hypothesis-driven investigation | | `agent-teams:team-implementer` | All tools | Building features within file ownership boundaries | | `agent-teams:team-lead` | All tools | Team orchestration and coordination | **Key distinction**: Read-only agents (Explore, Plan) cannot modify files. Never assign implementation tasks to read-only agents. ## Display Mode Configuration Configure in `~/.claude/settings.json`: ```json { "teammateMode": "tmux" } ``` | Mode | Behavior | Best For | | -------------- | ------------------------------ | ------------------------------------------------- | | `"tmux"` | Each teammate in a tmux pane | Development workflows, monitoring multiple agents | | `"iterm2"` | Each teammate in an iTerm2 tab | macOS users who prefer iTerm2 | | `"in-process"` | All teammates in same process | Simple tasks, CI/CD environments | ## Custom Team Guidelines When building custom teams: 1. **Every team needs a coordinator** β€” Either designate a `team-lead` or have the user coordinate directly 2. **Match roles to agent types** β€” Use specialized agents (reviewer, debugger, implementer) when available 3. **Avoid duplicate roles** β€” Two agents doing the same thing wastes resources 4. **Define boundaries upfront** β€” Each teammate needs clear ownership of files or responsibilities 5. **Keep it small** β€” 2-4 teammates is the sweet spot; 5+ requires significant coordination overhead
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

api-design-principles

Master REST and GraphQL API design principles to build intuitive,

coding
⭐1
# API Design Principles Master REST and GraphQL API design principles to build intuitive, scalable, and maintainable APIs that delight developers and stand the test of time. ## When to Use This Skill - Designing new REST or GraphQL APIs - Refactoring existing APIs for better usability - Establishing API design standards for your team - Reviewing API specifications before implementation - Migrating between API paradigms (REST to GraphQL, etc.) - Creating developer-friendly API documentation - Optimizing APIs for specific use cases (mobile, third-party integrations) ## Core Concepts ### 1. RESTful Design Principles **Resource-Oriented Architecture** - Resources are nouns (users, orders, products), not verbs - Use HTTP methods for actions (GET, POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE) - URLs represent resource hierarchies - Consistent naming conventions **HTTP Methods Semantics:** - `GET`: Retrieve resources (idempotent, safe) - `POST`: Create new resources - `PUT`: Replace entire resource (idempotent) - `PATCH`: Partial resource updates - `DELETE`: Remove resources (idempotent) ### 2. GraphQL Design Principles **Schema-First Development** - Types define your domain model - Queries for reading data - Mutations for modifying data - Subscriptions for real-time updates **Query Structure:** - Clients request exactly what they need - Single endpoint, multiple operations - Strongly typed schema - Introspection built-in ### 3. API Versioning Strategies **URL Versioning:** ``` /api/v1/users /api/v2/users ``` **Header Versioning:** ``` Accept: application/vnd.api+json; version=1 ``` **Query Parameter Versioning:** ``` /api/users?version=1 ``` ## REST API Design Patterns ### Pattern 1: Resource Collection Design ```python # Good: Resource-oriented endpoints GET /api/users # List users (with pagination) POST /api/users # Create user GET /api/users/{id} # Get specific user PUT /api/users/{id} # Replace user PATCH /api/users/{id} # Update user fields DELETE /api/users/{id} # Delete user # Nested resources GET /api/users/{id}/orders # Get user's orders POST /api/users/{id}/orders # Create order for user # Bad: Action-oriented endpoints (avoid) POST /api/createUser POST /api/getUserById POST /api/deleteUser ``` ### Pattern 2: Pagination and Filtering ```python from typing import List, Optional from pydantic import BaseModel, Field class PaginationParams(BaseModel): page: int = Field(1, ge=1, description="Page number") page_size: int = Field(20, ge=1, le=100, description="Items per page") class FilterParams(BaseModel): status: Optional[str] = None created_after: Optional[str] = None search: Optional[str] = None class PaginatedResponse(BaseModel): items: List[dict] total: int page: int page_size: int pages: int @property def has_next(self) -> bool: return self.page < self.pages @property def has_prev(self) -> bool: return self.page > 1 # FastAPI endpoint example from fastapi import FastAPI, Query, Depends app = FastAPI() @app.get("/api/users", response_model=PaginatedResponse) async def list_users( page: int = Query(1, ge=1), page_size: int = Query(20, ge=1, le=100), status: Optional[str] = Query(None), search: Optional[str] = Query(None) ): # Apply filters query = build_query(status=status, search=search) # Count total total = await count_users(query) # Fetch page offset = (page - 1) * page_size users = await fetch_users(query, limit=page_size, offset=offset) return PaginatedResponse( items=users, total=total, page=page, page_size=page_size, pages=(total + page_size - 1) // page_size ) ``` ### Pattern 3: Error Handling and Status Codes ```python from fastapi import HTTPException, status from pydantic import BaseModel class ErrorResponse(BaseModel): error: str message: str details: Optional[dict] = None timestamp: str path: str class ValidationErrorDetail(BaseModel): field: str message: str value: Any # Consistent error responses STATUS_CODES = { "success": 200, "created": 201, "no_content": 204, "bad_request": 400, "unauthorized": 401, "forbidden": 403, "not_found": 404, "conflict": 409, "unprocessable": 422, "internal_error": 500 } def raise_not_found(resource: str, id: str): raise HTTPException( status_code=status.HTTP_404_NOT_FOUND, detail={ "error": "NotFound", "message": f"{resource} not found", "details": {"id": id} } ) def raise_validation_error(errors: List[ValidationErrorDetail]): raise HTTPException( status_code=status.HTTP_422_UNPROCESSABLE_ENTITY, detail={ "error": "ValidationError", "message": "Request validation failed", "details": {"errors": [e.dict() for e in errors]} } ) # Example usage @app.get("/api/users/{user_id}") async def get_user(user_id: str): user = await fetch_user(user_id) if not user: raise_not_found("User", user_id) return user ``` ### Pattern 4: HATEOAS (Hypermedia as the Engine of Application State) ```python class UserResponse(BaseModel): id: str name: str email: str _links: dict @classmethod def from_user(cls, user: User, base_url: str): return cls( id=user.id, name=user.name, email=user.email, _links={ "self": {"href": f"{base_url}/api/users/{user.id}"}, "orders": {"href": f"{base_url}/api/users/{user.id}/orders"}, "update": { "href": f"{base_url}/api/users/{user.id}", "method": "PATCH" }, "delete": { "href": f"{base_url}/api/users/{user.id}", "method": "DELETE" } } ) ``` ## GraphQL Design Patterns ### Pattern 1: Schema Design ```graphql # schema.graphql # Clear type definitions type User { id: ID! email: String! name: String! createdAt: DateTime! # Relationships orders(first: Int = 20, after: String, status: OrderStatus): OrderConnection! profile: UserProfile } type Order { id: ID! status: OrderStatus! total: Money! items: [OrderItem!]! createdAt: DateTime! # Back-reference user: User! } # Pagination pattern (Relay-style) type OrderConnection { edges: [OrderEdge!]! pageInfo: PageInfo! totalCount: Int! } type OrderEdge { node: Order! cursor: String! } type PageInfo { hasNextPage: Boolean! hasPreviousPage: Boolean! startCursor: String endCursor: String } # Enums for type safety enum OrderStatus { PENDING CONFIRMED SHIPPED DELIVERED CANCELLED } # Custom scalars scalar DateTime scalar Money # Query root type Query { user(id: ID!): User users(first: Int = 20, after: String, search: String): UserConnection! order(id: ID!): Order } # Mutation root type Mutation { createUser(input: CreateUserInput!): CreateUserPayload! updateUser(input: UpdateUserInput!): UpdateUserPayload! deleteUser(id: ID!): DeleteUserPayload! createOrder(input: CreateOrderInput!): CreateOrderPayload! } # Input types for mutations input CreateUserInput { email: String! name: String! password: String! } # Payload types for mutations type CreateUserPayload { user: User errors: [Error!] } type Error { field: String message: String! } ``` ### Pattern 2: Resolver Design ```python from typing import Optional, List from ariadne import QueryType, MutationType, ObjectType from dataclasses import dataclass query = QueryType() mutation = MutationType() user_type = ObjectType("User") @query.field("user") async def resolve_user(obj, info, id: str) -> Optional[dict]: """Resolve single user by ID.""" return await fetch_user_by_id(id) @query.field("users") async def resolve_users( obj, info, first: int = 20, after: Optional[str] = None, search: Optional[str] = None ) -> dict: """Resolve paginated user list.""" # Decode cursor offset = decode_cursor(after) if after else 0 # Fetch users users = await fetch_users( limit=first + 1, # Fetch one extra to check hasNextPage offset=offset, search=search ) # Pagination has_next = len(users) > first if has_next: users = users[:first] edges = [ { "node": user, "cursor": encode_cursor(offset + i) } for i, user in enumerate(users) ] return { "edges": edges, "pageInfo": { "hasNextPage": has_next, "hasPreviousPage": offset > 0, "startCursor": edges[0]["cursor"] if edges else None, "endCursor": edges[-1]["cursor"] if edges else None }, "totalCount": await count_users(search=search) } @user_type.field("orders") async def resolve_user_orders(user: dict, info, first: int = 20) -> dict: """Resolve user's orders (N+1 prevention with DataLoader).""" # Use DataLoader to batch requests loader = info.context["loaders"]["orders_by_user"] orders = await loader.load(user["id"]) return paginate_orders(orders, first) @mutation.field("createUser") async def resolve_create_user(obj, info, input: dict) -> dict: """Create new user.""" try: # Validate input validate_user_input(input) # Create user user = await create_user( email=input["email"], name=input["name"], password=hash_password(input["password"]) ) return { "user": user, "errors": [] } except ValidationError as e: return { "user": None, "errors": [{"field": e.field, "message": e.message}] } ``` ### Pattern 3: DataLoader (N+1 Problem Prevention) ```python from aiodataloader import DataLoader from typing import List, Optional class UserLoader(DataLoader): """Batch load users by ID.""" async def batch_load_fn(self, user_ids: List[str]) -> List[Optional[dict]]: """Load multiple users in single query.""" users = await fetch_users_by_ids(user_ids) # Map results back to input order user_map = {user["id"]: user for user in users} return [user_map.get(user_id) for user_id in user_ids] class OrdersByUserLoader(DataLoader): """Batch load orders by user ID.""" async def batch_load_fn(self, user_ids: List[str]) -> List[List[dict]]: """Load orders for multiple users in single query.""" orders = await fetch_orders_by_user_ids(user_ids) # Group orders by user_id orders_by_user = {} for order in orders: user_id = order["user_id"] if user_id not in orders_by_user: orders_by_user[user_id] = [] orders_by_user[user_id].append(order) # Return in input order return [orders_by_user.get(user_id, []) for user_id in user_ids] # Context setup def create_context(): return { "loaders": { "user": UserLoader(), "orders_by_user": OrdersByUserLoader() } } ``` ## Best Practices ### REST APIs 1. **Consistent Naming**: Use plural nouns for collections (`/users`, not `/user`) 2. **Stateless**: Each request contains all necessary information 3. **Use HTTP Status Codes Correctly**: 2xx success, 4xx client errors, 5xx server errors 4. **Version Your API**: Plan for breaking changes from day one 5. **Pagination**: Always paginate large collections 6. **Rate Limiting**: Protect your API with rate limits 7. **Documentation**: Use OpenAPI/Swagger for interactive docs ### GraphQL APIs 1. **Schema First**: Design schema before writing resolvers 2. **Avoid N+1**: Use DataLoaders for efficient data fetching 3. **Input Validation**: Validate at schema and resolver levels 4. **Error Handling**: Return structured errors in mutation payloads 5. **Pagination**: Use cursor-based pagination (Relay spec) 6. **Deprecation**: Use `@deprecated` directive for gradual migration 7. **Monitoring**: Track query complexity and execution time ## Common Pitfalls - **Over-fetching/Under-fetching (REST)**: Fixed in GraphQL but requires DataLoaders - **Breaking Changes**: Version APIs or use deprecation strategies - **Inconsistent Error Formats**: Standardize error responses - **Missing Rate Limits**: APIs without limits are vulnerable to abuse - **Poor Documentation**: Undocumented APIs frustrate developers - **Ignoring HTTP Semantics**: POST for idempotent operations breaks expectations - **Tight Coupling**: API structure shouldn't mirror database schema ## Resources - **references/rest-best-practices.md**: Comprehensive REST API design guide - **references/graphql-schema-design.md**: GraphQL schema patterns and anti-patterns - **references/api-versioning-strategies.md**: Versioning approaches and migration paths - **assets/rest-api-template.py**: FastAPI REST API template - **assets/graphql-schema-template.graphql**: Complete GraphQL schema example - **assets/api-design-checklist.md**: Pre-implementation review checklist - **scripts/openapi-generator.py**: Generate OpenAPI specs from code
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

projection-patterns

Build read models and projections from event streams. Use when

coding
⭐1
# Projection Patterns Comprehensive guide to building projections and read models for event-sourced systems. ## When to Use This Skill - Building CQRS read models - Creating materialized views from events - Optimizing query performance - Implementing real-time dashboards - Building search indexes from events - Aggregating data across streams ## Core Concepts ### 1. Projection Architecture ``` β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Event Store │────►│ Projector │────►│ Read Model β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ (Database) β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Events β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Handler β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Tables β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Logic β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Views β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Cache β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ``` ### 2. Projection Types | Type | Description | Use Case | | -------------- | --------------------------- | ---------------------- | | **Live** | Real-time from subscription | Current state queries | | **Catchup** | Process historical events | Rebuilding read models | | **Persistent** | Stores checkpoint | Resume after restart | | **Inline** | Same transaction as write | Strong consistency | ## Templates ### Template 1: Basic Projector ```python from abc import ABC, abstractmethod from dataclasses import dataclass from typing import Dict, Any, Callable, List import asyncpg @dataclass class Event: stream_id: str event_type: str data: dict version: int global_position: int class Projection(ABC): """Base class for projections.""" @property @abstractmethod def name(self) -> str: """Unique projection name for checkpointing.""" pass @abstractmethod def handles(self) -> List[str]: """List of event types this projection handles.""" pass @abstractmethod async def apply(self, event: Event) -> None: """Apply event to the read model.""" pass class Projector: """Runs projections from event store.""" def __init__(self, event_store, checkpoint_store): self.event_store = event_store self.checkpoint_store = checkpoint_store self.projections: List[Projection] = [] def register(self, projection: Projection): self.projections.append(projection) async def run(self, batch_size: int = 100): """Run all projections continuously.""" while True: for projection in self.projections: await self._run_projection(projection, batch_size) await asyncio.sleep(0.1) async def _run_projection(self, projection: Projection, batch_size: int): checkpoint = await self.checkpoint_store.get(projection.name) position = checkpoint or 0 events = await self.event_store.read_all(position, batch_size) for event in events: if event.event_type in projection.handles(): await projection.apply(event) await self.checkpoint_store.save( projection.name, event.global_position ) async def rebuild(self, projection: Projection): """Rebuild a projection from scratch.""" await self.checkpoint_store.delete(projection.name) # Optionally clear read model tables await self._run_projection(projection, batch_size=1000) ``` ### Template 2: Order Summary Projection ```python class OrderSummaryProjection(Projection): """Projects order events to a summary read model.""" def __init__(self, db_pool: asyncpg.Pool): self.pool = db_pool @property def name(self) -> str: return "order_summary" def handles(self) -> List[str]: return [ "OrderCreated", "OrderItemAdded", "OrderItemRemoved", "OrderShipped", "OrderCompleted", "OrderCancelled" ] async def apply(self, event: Event) -> None: handlers = { "OrderCreated": self._handle_created, "OrderItemAdded": self._handle_item_added, "OrderItemRemoved": self._handle_item_removed, "OrderShipped": self._handle_shipped, "OrderCompleted": self._handle_completed, "OrderCancelled": self._handle_cancelled, } handler = handlers.get(event.event_type) if handler: await handler(event) async def _handle_created(self, event: Event): async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: await conn.execute( """ INSERT INTO order_summaries (order_id, customer_id, status, total_amount, item_count, created_at) VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4, $5, $6) """, event.data['order_id'], event.data['customer_id'], 'pending', 0, 0, event.data['created_at'] ) async def _handle_item_added(self, event: Event): async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: await conn.execute( """ UPDATE order_summaries SET total_amount = total_amount + $2, item_count = item_count + 1, updated_at = NOW() WHERE order_id = $1 """, event.data['order_id'], event.data['price'] * event.data['quantity'] ) async def _handle_item_removed(self, event: Event): async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: await conn.execute( """ UPDATE order_summaries SET total_amount = total_amount - $2, item_count = item_count - 1, updated_at = NOW() WHERE order_id = $1 """, event.data['order_id'], event.data['price'] * event.data['quantity'] ) async def _handle_shipped(self, event: Event): async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: await conn.execute( """ UPDATE order_summaries SET status = 'shipped', shipped_at = $2, updated_at = NOW() WHERE order_id = $1 """, event.data['order_id'], event.data['shipped_at'] ) async def _handle_completed(self, event: Event): async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: await conn.execute( """ UPDATE order_summaries SET status = 'completed', completed_at = $2, updated_at = NOW() WHERE order_id = $1 """, event.data['order_id'], event.data['completed_at'] ) async def _handle_cancelled(self, event: Event): async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: await conn.execute( """ UPDATE order_summaries SET status = 'cancelled', cancelled_at = $2, cancellation_reason = $3, updated_at = NOW() WHERE order_id = $1 """, event.data['order_id'], event.data['cancelled_at'], event.data.get('reason') ) ``` ### Template 3: Elasticsearch Search Projection ```python from elasticsearch import AsyncElasticsearch class ProductSearchProjection(Projection): """Projects product events to Elasticsearch for full-text search.""" def __init__(self, es_client: AsyncElasticsearch): self.es = es_client self.index = "products" @property def name(self) -> str: return "product_search" def handles(self) -> List[str]: return [ "ProductCreated", "ProductUpdated", "ProductPriceChanged", "ProductDeleted" ] async def apply(self, event: Event) -> None: if event.event_type == "ProductCreated": await self.es.index( index=self.index, id=event.data['product_id'], document={ 'name': event.data['name'], 'description': event.data['description'], 'category': event.data['category'], 'price': event.data['price'], 'tags': event.data.get('tags', []), 'created_at': event.data['created_at'] } ) elif event.event_type == "ProductUpdated": await self.es.update( index=self.index, id=event.data['product_id'], doc={ 'name': event.data['name'], 'description': event.data['description'], 'category': event.data['category'], 'tags': event.data.get('tags', []), 'updated_at': event.data['updated_at'] } ) elif event.event_type == "ProductPriceChanged": await self.es.update( index=self.index, id=event.data['product_id'], doc={ 'price': event.data['new_price'], 'price_updated_at': event.data['changed_at'] } ) elif event.event_type == "ProductDeleted": await self.es.delete( index=self.index, id=event.data['product_id'] ) ``` ### Template 4: Aggregating Projection ```python class DailySalesProjection(Projection): """Aggregates sales data by day for reporting.""" def __init__(self, db_pool: asyncpg.Pool): self.pool = db_pool @property def name(self) -> str: return "daily_sales" def handles(self) -> List[str]: return ["OrderCompleted", "OrderRefunded"] async def apply(self, event: Event) -> None: if event.event_type == "OrderCompleted": await self._increment_sales(event) elif event.event_type == "OrderRefunded": await self._decrement_sales(event) async def _increment_sales(self, event: Event): date = event.data['completed_at'][:10] # YYYY-MM-DD async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: await conn.execute( """ INSERT INTO daily_sales (date, total_orders, total_revenue, total_items) VALUES ($1, 1, $2, $3) ON CONFLICT (date) DO UPDATE SET total_orders = daily_sales.total_orders + 1, total_revenue = daily_sales.total_revenue + $2, total_items = daily_sales.total_items + $3, updated_at = NOW() """, date, event.data['total_amount'], event.data['item_count'] ) async def _decrement_sales(self, event: Event): date = event.data['original_completed_at'][:10] async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: await conn.execute( """ UPDATE daily_sales SET total_orders = total_orders - 1, total_revenue = total_revenue - $2, total_refunds = total_refunds + $2, updated_at = NOW() WHERE date = $1 """, date, event.data['refund_amount'] ) ``` ### Template 5: Multi-Table Projection ```python class CustomerActivityProjection(Projection): """Projects customer activity across multiple tables.""" def __init__(self, db_pool: asyncpg.Pool): self.pool = db_pool @property def name(self) -> str: return "customer_activity" def handles(self) -> List[str]: return [ "CustomerCreated", "OrderCompleted", "ReviewSubmitted", "CustomerTierChanged" ] async def apply(self, event: Event) -> None: async with self.pool.acquire() as conn: async with conn.transaction(): if event.event_type == "CustomerCreated": # Insert into customers table await conn.execute( """ INSERT INTO customers (customer_id, email, name, tier, created_at) VALUES ($1, $2, $3, 'bronze', $4) """, event.data['customer_id'], event.data['email'], event.data['name'], event.data['created_at'] ) # Initialize activity summary await conn.execute( """ INSERT INTO customer_activity_summary (customer_id, total_orders, total_spent, total_reviews) VALUES ($1, 0, 0, 0) """, event.data['customer_id'] ) elif event.event_type == "OrderCompleted": # Update activity summary await conn.execute( """ UPDATE customer_activity_summary SET total_orders = total_orders + 1, total_spent = total_spent + $2, last_order_at = $3 WHERE customer_id = $1 """, event.data['customer_id'], event.data['total_amount'], event.data['completed_at'] ) # Insert into order history await conn.execute( """ INSERT INTO customer_order_history (customer_id, order_id, amount, completed_at) VALUES ($1, $2, $3, $4) """, event.data['customer_id'], event.data['order_id'], event.data['total_amount'], event.data['completed_at'] ) elif event.event_type == "ReviewSubmitted": await conn.execute( """ UPDATE customer_activity_summary SET total_reviews = total_reviews + 1, last_review_at = $2 WHERE customer_id = $1 """, event.data['customer_id'], event.data['submitted_at'] ) elif event.event_type == "CustomerTierChanged": await conn.execute( """ UPDATE customers SET tier = $2, updated_at = NOW() WHERE customer_id = $1 """, event.data['customer_id'], event.data['new_tier'] ) ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Make projections idempotent** - Safe to replay - **Use transactions** - For multi-table updates - **Store checkpoints** - Resume after failures - **Monitor lag** - Alert on projection delays - **Plan for rebuilds** - Design for reconstruction ### Don'ts - **Don't couple projections** - Each is independent - **Don't skip error handling** - Log and alert on failures - **Don't ignore ordering** - Events must be processed in order - **Don't over-normalize** - Denormalize for query patterns ## Resources - [CQRS Pattern](https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/architecture/patterns/cqrs) - [Projection Building Blocks](https://zimarev.com/blog/event-sourcing/projections/)
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

data-storytelling

Transform data into compelling narratives using visualization,

data
⭐1
# Data Storytelling Transform raw data into compelling narratives that drive decisions and inspire action. ## When to Use This Skill - Presenting analytics to executives - Creating quarterly business reviews - Building investor presentations - Writing data-driven reports - Communicating insights to non-technical audiences - Making recommendations based on data ## Core Concepts ### 1. Story Structure ``` Setup β†’ Conflict β†’ Resolution Setup: Context and baseline Conflict: The problem or opportunity Resolution: Insights and recommendations ``` ### 2. Narrative Arc ``` 1. Hook: Grab attention with surprising insight 2. Context: Establish the baseline 3. Rising Action: Build through data points 4. Climax: The key insight 5. Resolution: Recommendations 6. Call to Action: Next steps ``` ### 3. Three Pillars | Pillar | Purpose | Components | | ------------- | -------- | -------------------------------- | | **Data** | Evidence | Numbers, trends, comparisons | | **Narrative** | Meaning | Context, causation, implications | | **Visuals** | Clarity | Charts, diagrams, highlights | ## Story Frameworks ### Framework 1: The Problem-Solution Story ```markdown # Customer Churn Analysis ## The Hook "We're losing $2.4M annually to preventable churn." ## The Context - Current churn rate: 8.5% (industry average: 5%) - Average customer lifetime value: $4,800 - 500 customers churned last quarter ## The Problem Analysis of churned customers reveals a pattern: - 73% churned within first 90 days - Common factor: < 3 support interactions - Low feature adoption in first month ## The Insight [Show engagement curve visualization] Customers who don't engage in the first 14 days are 4x more likely to churn. ## The Solution 1. Implement 14-day onboarding sequence 2. Proactive outreach at day 7 3. Feature adoption tracking ## Expected Impact - Reduce early churn by 40% - Save $960K annually - Payback period: 3 months ## Call to Action Approve $50K budget for onboarding automation. ``` ### Framework 2: The Trend Story ```markdown # Q4 Performance Analysis ## Where We Started Q3 ended with $1.2M MRR, 15% below target. Team morale was low after missed goals. ## What Changed [Timeline visualization] - Oct: Launched self-serve pricing - Nov: Reduced friction in signup - Dec: Added customer success calls ## The Transformation [Before/after comparison chart] | Metric | Q3 | Q4 | Change | |----------------|--------|--------|--------| | Trial β†’ Paid | 8% | 15% | +87% | | Time to Value | 14 days| 5 days | -64% | | Expansion Rate | 2% | 8% | +300% | ## Key Insight Self-serve + high-touch creates compound growth. Customers who self-serve AND get a success call have 3x higher expansion rate. ## Going Forward Double down on hybrid model. Target: $1.8M MRR by Q2. ``` ### Framework 3: The Comparison Story ```markdown # Market Opportunity Analysis ## The Question Should we expand into EMEA or APAC first? ## The Comparison [Side-by-side market analysis] ### EMEA - Market size: $4.2B - Growth rate: 8% - Competition: High - Regulatory: Complex (GDPR) - Language: Multiple ### APAC - Market size: $3.8B - Growth rate: 15% - Competition: Moderate - Regulatory: Varied - Language: Multiple ## The Analysis [Weighted scoring matrix visualization] | Factor | Weight | EMEA Score | APAC Score | | ----------- | ------ | ---------- | ---------- | | Market Size | 25% | 5 | 4 | | Growth | 30% | 3 | 5 | | Competition | 20% | 2 | 4 | | Ease | 25% | 2 | 3 | | **Total** | | **2.9** | **4.1** | ## The Recommendation APAC first. Higher growth, less competition. Start with Singapore hub (English, business-friendly). Enter EMEA in Year 2 with localization ready. ## Risk Mitigation - Timezone coverage: Hire 24/7 support - Cultural fit: Local partnerships - Payment: Multi-currency from day 1 ``` ## Visualization Techniques ### Technique 1: Progressive Reveal ```markdown Start simple, add layers: Slide 1: "Revenue is growing" [single line chart] Slide 2: "But growth is slowing" [add growth rate overlay] Slide 3: "Driven by one segment" [add segment breakdown] Slide 4: "Which is saturating" [add market share] Slide 5: "We need new segments" [add opportunity zones] ``` ### Technique 2: Contrast and Compare ```markdown Before/After: β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ BEFORE β”‚ AFTER β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Process: 5 daysβ”‚ Process: 1 day β”‚ β”‚ Errors: 15% β”‚ Errors: 2% β”‚ β”‚ Cost: $50/unit β”‚ Cost: $20/unit β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ This/That (emphasize difference): β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ CUSTOMER A vs B β”‚ β”‚ β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆβ–ˆ β”‚ β”‚ β–ˆβ–ˆ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ $45,000 β”‚ β”‚ $8,000 β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ LTV β”‚ β”‚ LTV β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β”‚ β”‚ Onboarded No onboarding β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ``` ### Technique 3: Annotation and Highlight ```python import matplotlib.pyplot as plt import pandas as pd fig, ax = plt.subplots(figsize=(12, 6)) # Plot the main data ax.plot(dates, revenue, linewidth=2, color='#2E86AB') # Add annotation for key events ax.annotate( 'Product Launch\n+32% spike', xy=(launch_date, launch_revenue), xytext=(launch_date, launch_revenue * 1.2), fontsize=10, arrowprops=dict(arrowstyle='->', color='#E63946'), color='#E63946' ) # Highlight a region ax.axvspan(growth_start, growth_end, alpha=0.2, color='green', label='Growth Period') # Add threshold line ax.axhline(y=target, color='gray', linestyle='--', label=f'Target: ${target:,.0f}') ax.set_title('Revenue Growth Story', fontsize=14, fontweight='bold') ax.legend() ``` ## Presentation Templates ### Template 1: Executive Summary Slide ``` β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ KEY INSIGHT β”‚ β”‚ ══════════════════════════════════════════════════════════│ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ "Customers who complete onboarding in week 1 β”‚ β”‚ have 3x higher lifetime value" β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ THE DATA β”‚ THE IMPLICATION β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Week 1 completers: β”‚ βœ“ Prioritize onboarding UX β”‚ β”‚ β€’ LTV: $4,500 β”‚ βœ“ Add day-1 success milestones β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Retention: 85% β”‚ βœ“ Proactive week-1 outreach β”‚ β”‚ β€’ NPS: 72 β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ Investment: $75K β”‚ β”‚ Others: β”‚ Expected ROI: 8x β”‚ β”‚ β€’ LTV: $1,500 β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β€’ Retention: 45% β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β€’ NPS: 34 β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ``` ### Template 2: Data Story Flow ``` Slide 1: THE HEADLINE "We can grow 40% faster by fixing onboarding" Slide 2: THE CONTEXT Current state metrics Industry benchmarks Gap analysis Slide 3: THE DISCOVERY What the data revealed Surprising finding Pattern identification Slide 4: THE DEEP DIVE Root cause analysis Segment breakdowns Statistical significance Slide 5: THE RECOMMENDATION Proposed actions Resource requirements Timeline Slide 6: THE IMPACT Expected outcomes ROI calculation Risk assessment Slide 7: THE ASK Specific request Decision needed Next steps ``` ### Template 3: One-Page Dashboard Story ```markdown # Monthly Business Review: January 2024 ## THE HEADLINE Revenue up 15% but CAC increasing faster than LTV ## KEY METRICS AT A GLANCE β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”¬β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ MRR β”‚ NRR β”‚ CAC β”‚ LTV β”‚ β”‚ $125K β”‚ 108% β”‚ $450 β”‚ $2,200 β”‚ β”‚ β–²15% β”‚ β–²3% β”‚ β–²22% β”‚ β–²8% β”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”΄β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ## WHAT'S WORKING βœ“ Enterprise segment growing 25% MoM βœ“ Referral program driving 30% of new logos βœ“ Support satisfaction at all-time high (94%) ## WHAT NEEDS ATTENTION βœ— SMB acquisition cost up 40% βœ— Trial conversion down 5 points βœ— Time-to-value increased by 3 days ## ROOT CAUSE [Mini chart showing SMB vs Enterprise CAC trend] SMB paid ads becoming less efficient. CPC up 35% while conversion flat. ## RECOMMENDATION 1. Shift $20K/mo from paid to content 2. Launch SMB self-serve trial 3. A/B test shorter onboarding ## NEXT MONTH'S FOCUS - Launch content marketing pilot - Complete self-serve MVP - Reduce time-to-value to < 7 days ``` ## Writing Techniques ### Headlines That Work ```markdown BAD: "Q4 Sales Analysis" GOOD: "Q4 Sales Beat Target by 23% - Here's Why" BAD: "Customer Churn Report" GOOD: "We're Losing $2.4M to Preventable Churn" BAD: "Marketing Performance" GOOD: "Content Marketing Delivers 4x ROI vs. Paid" Formula: [Specific Number] + [Business Impact] + [Actionable Context] ``` ### Transition Phrases ```markdown Building the narrative: β€’ "This leads us to ask..." β€’ "When we dig deeper..." β€’ "The pattern becomes clear when..." β€’ "Contrast this with..." Introducing insights: β€’ "The data reveals..." β€’ "What surprised us was..." β€’ "The inflection point came when..." β€’ "The key finding is..." Moving to action: β€’ "This insight suggests..." β€’ "Based on this analysis..." β€’ "The implication is clear..." β€’ "Our recommendation is..." ``` ### Handling Uncertainty ```markdown Acknowledge limitations: β€’ "With 95% confidence, we can say..." β€’ "The sample size of 500 shows..." β€’ "While correlation is strong, causation requires..." β€’ "This trend holds for [segment], though [caveat]..." Present ranges: β€’ "Impact estimate: $400K-$600K" β€’ "Confidence interval: 15-20% improvement" β€’ "Best case: X, Conservative: Y" ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Start with the "so what"** - Lead with insight - **Use the rule of three** - Three points, three comparisons - **Show, don't tell** - Let data speak - **Make it personal** - Connect to audience goals - **End with action** - Clear next steps ### Don'ts - **Don't data dump** - Curate ruthlessly - **Don't bury the insight** - Front-load key findings - **Don't use jargon** - Match audience vocabulary - **Don't show methodology first** - Context, then method - **Don't forget the narrative** - Numbers need meaning ## Resources - [Storytelling with Data (Cole Nussbaumer)](https://www.storytellingwithdata.com/) - [The Pyramid Principle (Barbara Minto)](https://www.amazon.com/Pyramid-Principle-Logic-Writing-Thinking/dp/0273710516) - [Resonate (Nancy Duarte)](https://www.duarte.com/resonate/)
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

deployment-pipeline-design

Design multi-stage CI/CD pipelines with approval gates, security

coding
⭐1
# Deployment Pipeline Design Architecture patterns for multi-stage CI/CD pipelines with approval gates and deployment strategies. ## Purpose Design robust, secure deployment pipelines that balance speed with safety through proper stage organization and approval workflows. ## When to Use - Design CI/CD architecture - Implement deployment gates - Configure multi-environment pipelines - Establish deployment best practices - Implement progressive delivery ## Pipeline Stages ### Standard Pipeline Flow ``` β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”Œβ”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β” β”‚ Build β”‚ β†’ β”‚ Test β”‚ β†’ β”‚ Staging β”‚ β†’ β”‚ Approveβ”‚ β†’ β”‚Productionβ”‚ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ β””β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”€β”˜ ``` ### Detailed Stage Breakdown 1. **Source** - Code checkout 2. **Build** - Compile, package, containerize 3. **Test** - Unit, integration, security scans 4. **Staging Deploy** - Deploy to staging environment 5. **Integration Tests** - E2E, smoke tests 6. **Approval Gate** - Manual approval required 7. **Production Deploy** - Canary, blue-green, rolling 8. **Verification** - Health checks, monitoring 9. **Rollback** - Automated rollback on failure ## Approval Gate Patterns ### Pattern 1: Manual Approval ```yaml # GitHub Actions production-deploy: needs: staging-deploy environment: name: production url: https://app.example.com runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Deploy to production run: | # Deployment commands ``` ### Pattern 2: Time-Based Approval ```yaml # GitLab CI deploy:production: stage: deploy script: - deploy.sh production environment: name: production when: delayed start_in: 30 minutes only: - main ``` ### Pattern 3: Multi-Approver ```yaml # Azure Pipelines stages: - stage: Production dependsOn: Staging jobs: - deployment: Deploy environment: name: production resourceType: Kubernetes strategy: runOnce: preDeploy: steps: - task: ManualValidation@0 inputs: notifyUsers: "team-leads@example.com" instructions: "Review staging metrics before approving" ``` **Reference:** See `assets/approval-gate-template.yml` ## Deployment Strategies ### 1. Rolling Deployment ```yaml apiVersion: apps/v1 kind: Deployment metadata: name: my-app spec: replicas: 10 strategy: type: RollingUpdate rollingUpdate: maxSurge: 2 maxUnavailable: 1 ``` **Characteristics:** - Gradual rollout - Zero downtime - Easy rollback - Best for most applications ### 2. Blue-Green Deployment ```yaml # Blue (current) kubectl apply -f blue-deployment.yaml kubectl label service my-app version=blue # Green (new) kubectl apply -f green-deployment.yaml # Test green environment kubectl label service my-app version=green # Rollback if needed kubectl label service my-app version=blue ``` **Characteristics:** - Instant switchover - Easy rollback - Doubles infrastructure cost temporarily - Good for high-risk deployments ### 3. Canary Deployment ```yaml apiVersion: argoproj.io/v1alpha1 kind: Rollout metadata: name: my-app spec: replicas: 10 strategy: canary: steps: - setWeight: 10 - pause: { duration: 5m } - setWeight: 25 - pause: { duration: 5m } - setWeight: 50 - pause: { duration: 5m } - setWeight: 100 ``` **Characteristics:** - Gradual traffic shift - Risk mitigation - Real user testing - Requires service mesh or similar ### 4. Feature Flags ```python from flagsmith import Flagsmith flagsmith = Flagsmith(environment_key="API_KEY") if flagsmith.has_feature("new_checkout_flow"): # New code path process_checkout_v2() else: # Existing code path process_checkout_v1() ``` **Characteristics:** - Deploy without releasing - A/B testing - Instant rollback - Granular control ## Pipeline Orchestration ### Multi-Stage Pipeline Example ```yaml name: Production Pipeline on: push: branches: [main] jobs: build: runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - uses: actions/checkout@v4 - name: Build application run: make build - name: Build Docker image run: docker build -t myapp:${{ github.sha }} . - name: Push to registry run: docker push myapp:${{ github.sha }} test: needs: build runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Unit tests run: make test - name: Security scan run: trivy image myapp:${{ github.sha }} deploy-staging: needs: test runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: name: staging steps: - name: Deploy to staging run: kubectl apply -f k8s/staging/ integration-test: needs: deploy-staging runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Run E2E tests run: npm run test:e2e deploy-production: needs: integration-test runs-on: ubuntu-latest environment: name: production steps: - name: Canary deployment run: | kubectl apply -f k8s/production/ kubectl argo rollouts promote my-app verify: needs: deploy-production runs-on: ubuntu-latest steps: - name: Health check run: curl -f https://app.example.com/health - name: Notify team run: | curl -X POST ${{ secrets.SLACK_WEBHOOK }} \ -d '{"text":"Production deployment successful!"}' ``` ## Pipeline Best Practices 1. **Fail fast** - Run quick tests first 2. **Parallel execution** - Run independent jobs concurrently 3. **Caching** - Cache dependencies between runs 4. **Artifact management** - Store build artifacts 5. **Environment parity** - Keep environments consistent 6. **Secrets management** - Use secret stores (Vault, etc.) 7. **Deployment windows** - Schedule deployments appropriately 8. **Monitoring integration** - Track deployment metrics 9. **Rollback automation** - Auto-rollback on failures 10. **Documentation** - Document pipeline stages ## Rollback Strategies ### Automated Rollback ```yaml deploy-and-verify: steps: - name: Deploy new version run: kubectl apply -f k8s/ - name: Wait for rollout run: kubectl rollout status deployment/my-app - name: Health check id: health run: | for i in {1..10}; do if curl -sf https://app.example.com/health; then exit 0 fi sleep 10 done exit 1 - name: Rollback on failure if: failure() run: kubectl rollout undo deployment/my-app ``` ### Manual Rollback ```bash # List revision history kubectl rollout history deployment/my-app # Rollback to previous version kubectl rollout undo deployment/my-app # Rollback to specific revision kubectl rollout undo deployment/my-app --to-revision=3 ``` ## Monitoring and Metrics ### Key Pipeline Metrics - **Deployment Frequency** - How often deployments occur - **Lead Time** - Time from commit to production - **Change Failure Rate** - Percentage of failed deployments - **Mean Time to Recovery (MTTR)** - Time to recover from failure - **Pipeline Success Rate** - Percentage of successful runs - **Average Pipeline Duration** - Time to complete pipeline ### Integration with Monitoring ```yaml - name: Post-deployment verification run: | # Wait for metrics stabilization sleep 60 # Check error rate ERROR_RATE=$(curl -s "$PROMETHEUS_URL/api/v1/query?query=rate(http_errors_total[5m])" | jq '.data.result[0].value[1]') if (( $(echo "$ERROR_RATE > 0.01" | bc -l) )); then echo "Error rate too high: $ERROR_RATE" exit 1 fi ``` ## Reference Files - `references/pipeline-orchestration.md` - Complex pipeline patterns - `assets/approval-gate-template.yml` - Approval workflow templates ## Related Skills - `github-actions-templates` - For GitHub Actions implementation - `gitlab-ci-patterns` - For GitLab CI implementation - `secrets-management` - For secrets handling
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

cost-optimization

Optimize cloud costs through resource rightsizing, tagging

architecture
⭐1
# Cloud Cost Optimization Strategies and patterns for optimizing cloud costs across AWS, Azure, and GCP. ## Purpose Implement systematic cost optimization strategies to reduce cloud spending while maintaining performance and reliability. ## When to Use - Reduce cloud spending - Right-size resources - Implement cost governance - Optimize multi-cloud costs - Meet budget constraints ## Cost Optimization Framework ### 1. Visibility - Implement cost allocation tags - Use cloud cost management tools - Set up budget alerts - Create cost dashboards ### 2. Right-Sizing - Analyze resource utilization - Downsize over-provisioned resources - Use auto-scaling - Remove idle resources ### 3. Pricing Models - Use reserved capacity - Leverage spot/preemptible instances - Implement savings plans - Use committed use discounts ### 4. Architecture Optimization - Use managed services - Implement caching - Optimize data transfer - Use lifecycle policies ## AWS Cost Optimization ### Reserved Instances ``` Savings: 30-72% vs On-Demand Term: 1 or 3 years Payment: All/Partial/No upfront Flexibility: Standard or Convertible ``` ### Savings Plans ``` Compute Savings Plans: 66% savings EC2 Instance Savings Plans: 72% savings Applies to: EC2, Fargate, Lambda Flexible across: Instance families, regions, OS ``` ### Spot Instances ``` Savings: Up to 90% vs On-Demand Best for: Batch jobs, CI/CD, stateless workloads Risk: 2-minute interruption notice Strategy: Mix with On-Demand for resilience ``` ### S3 Cost Optimization ```hcl resource "aws_s3_bucket_lifecycle_configuration" "example" { bucket = aws_s3_bucket.example.id rule { id = "transition-to-ia" status = "Enabled" transition { days = 30 storage_class = "STANDARD_IA" } transition { days = 90 storage_class = "GLACIER" } expiration { days = 365 } } } ``` ## Azure Cost Optimization ### Reserved VM Instances - 1 or 3 year terms - Up to 72% savings - Flexible sizing - Exchangeable ### Azure Hybrid Benefit - Use existing Windows Server licenses - Up to 80% savings with RI - Available for Windows and SQL Server ### Azure Advisor Recommendations - Right-size VMs - Delete unused resources - Use reserved capacity - Optimize storage ## GCP Cost Optimization ### Committed Use Discounts - 1 or 3 year commitment - Up to 57% savings - Applies to vCPUs and memory - Resource-based or spend-based ### Sustained Use Discounts - Automatic discounts - Up to 30% for running instances - No commitment required - Applies to Compute Engine, GKE ### Preemptible VMs - Up to 80% savings - 24-hour maximum runtime - Best for batch workloads ## Tagging Strategy ### AWS Tagging ```hcl locals { common_tags = { Environment = "production" Project = "my-project" CostCenter = "engineering" Owner = "team@example.com" ManagedBy = "terraform" } } resource "aws_instance" "example" { ami = "ami-12345678" instance_type = "t3.medium" tags = merge( local.common_tags, { Name = "web-server" } ) } ``` **Reference:** See `references/tagging-standards.md` ## Cost Monitoring ### Budget Alerts ```hcl # AWS Budget resource "aws_budgets_budget" "monthly" { name = "monthly-budget" budget_type = "COST" limit_amount = "1000" limit_unit = "USD" time_period_start = "2024-01-01_00:00" time_unit = "MONTHLY" notification { comparison_operator = "GREATER_THAN" threshold = 80 threshold_type = "PERCENTAGE" notification_type = "ACTUAL" subscriber_email_addresses = ["team@example.com"] } } ``` ### Cost Anomaly Detection - AWS Cost Anomaly Detection - Azure Cost Management alerts - GCP Budget alerts ## Architecture Patterns ### Pattern 1: Serverless First - Use Lambda/Functions for event-driven - Pay only for execution time - Auto-scaling included - No idle costs ### Pattern 2: Right-Sized Databases ``` Development: t3.small RDS Staging: t3.large RDS Production: r6g.2xlarge RDS with read replicas ``` ### Pattern 3: Multi-Tier Storage ``` Hot data: S3 Standard Warm data: S3 Standard-IA (30 days) Cold data: S3 Glacier (90 days) Archive: S3 Deep Archive (365 days) ``` ### Pattern 4: Auto-Scaling ```hcl resource "aws_autoscaling_policy" "scale_up" { name = "scale-up" scaling_adjustment = 2 adjustment_type = "ChangeInCapacity" cooldown = 300 autoscaling_group_name = aws_autoscaling_group.main.name } resource "aws_cloudwatch_metric_alarm" "cpu_high" { alarm_name = "cpu-high" comparison_operator = "GreaterThanThreshold" evaluation_periods = "2" metric_name = "CPUUtilization" namespace = "AWS/EC2" period = "60" statistic = "Average" threshold = "80" alarm_actions = [aws_autoscaling_policy.scale_up.arn] } ``` ## Cost Optimization Checklist - [ ] Implement cost allocation tags - [ ] Delete unused resources (EBS, EIPs, snapshots) - [ ] Right-size instances based on utilization - [ ] Use reserved capacity for steady workloads - [ ] Implement auto-scaling - [ ] Optimize storage classes - [ ] Use lifecycle policies - [ ] Enable cost anomaly detection - [ ] Set budget alerts - [ ] Review costs weekly - [ ] Use spot/preemptible instances - [ ] Optimize data transfer costs - [ ] Implement caching layers - [ ] Use managed services - [ ] Monitor and optimize continuously ## Tools - **AWS:** Cost Explorer, Cost Anomaly Detection, Compute Optimizer - **Azure:** Cost Management, Advisor - **GCP:** Cost Management, Recommender - **Multi-cloud:** CloudHealth, Cloudability, Kubecost ## Reference Files - `references/tagging-standards.md` - Tagging conventions - `assets/cost-analysis-template.xlsx` - Cost analysis spreadsheet ## Related Skills - `terraform-module-library` - For resource provisioning - `multi-cloud-architecture` - For cloud selection
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

istio-traffic-management

Configure Istio traffic management including routing, load

architecture
⭐1
# Istio Traffic Management Comprehensive guide to Istio traffic management for production service mesh deployments. ## When to Use This Skill - Configuring service-to-service routing - Implementing canary or blue-green deployments - Setting up circuit breakers and retries - Load balancing configuration - Traffic mirroring for testing - Fault injection for chaos engineering ## Core Concepts ### 1. Traffic Management Resources | Resource | Purpose | Scope | | ------------------- | ----------------------------- | ------------- | | **VirtualService** | Route traffic to destinations | Host-based | | **DestinationRule** | Define policies after routing | Service-based | | **Gateway** | Configure ingress/egress | Cluster edge | | **ServiceEntry** | Add external services | Mesh-wide | ### 2. Traffic Flow ``` Client β†’ Gateway β†’ VirtualService β†’ DestinationRule β†’ Service (routing) (policies) (pods) ``` ## Templates ### Template 1: Basic Routing ```yaml apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: reviews-route namespace: bookinfo spec: hosts: - reviews http: - match: - headers: end-user: exact: jason route: - destination: host: reviews subset: v2 - route: - destination: host: reviews subset: v1 --- apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: reviews-destination namespace: bookinfo spec: host: reviews subsets: - name: v1 labels: version: v1 - name: v2 labels: version: v2 - name: v3 labels: version: v3 ``` ### Template 2: Canary Deployment ```yaml apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: my-service-canary spec: hosts: - my-service http: - route: - destination: host: my-service subset: stable weight: 90 - destination: host: my-service subset: canary weight: 10 --- apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: my-service-dr spec: host: my-service trafficPolicy: connectionPool: tcp: maxConnections: 100 http: h2UpgradePolicy: UPGRADE http1MaxPendingRequests: 100 http2MaxRequests: 1000 subsets: - name: stable labels: version: stable - name: canary labels: version: canary ``` ### Template 3: Circuit Breaker ```yaml apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: circuit-breaker spec: host: my-service trafficPolicy: connectionPool: tcp: maxConnections: 100 http: http1MaxPendingRequests: 100 http2MaxRequests: 1000 maxRequestsPerConnection: 10 maxRetries: 3 outlierDetection: consecutive5xxErrors: 5 interval: 30s baseEjectionTime: 30s maxEjectionPercent: 50 minHealthPercent: 30 ``` ### Template 4: Retry and Timeout ```yaml apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: ratings-retry spec: hosts: - ratings http: - route: - destination: host: ratings timeout: 10s retries: attempts: 3 perTryTimeout: 3s retryOn: connect-failure,refused-stream,unavailable,cancelled,retriable-4xx,503 retryRemoteLocalities: true ``` ### Template 5: Traffic Mirroring ```yaml apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: mirror-traffic spec: hosts: - my-service http: - route: - destination: host: my-service subset: v1 mirror: host: my-service subset: v2 mirrorPercentage: value: 100.0 ``` ### Template 6: Fault Injection ```yaml apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: fault-injection spec: hosts: - ratings http: - fault: delay: percentage: value: 10 fixedDelay: 5s abort: percentage: value: 5 httpStatus: 503 route: - destination: host: ratings ``` ### Template 7: Ingress Gateway ```yaml apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: Gateway metadata: name: my-gateway spec: selector: istio: ingressgateway servers: - port: number: 443 name: https protocol: HTTPS tls: mode: SIMPLE credentialName: my-tls-secret hosts: - "*.example.com" --- apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: VirtualService metadata: name: my-vs spec: hosts: - "api.example.com" gateways: - my-gateway http: - match: - uri: prefix: /api/v1 route: - destination: host: api-service port: number: 8080 ``` ## Load Balancing Strategies ```yaml apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: load-balancing spec: host: my-service trafficPolicy: loadBalancer: simple: ROUND_ROBIN # or LEAST_CONN, RANDOM, PASSTHROUGH --- # Consistent hashing for sticky sessions apiVersion: networking.istio.io/v1beta1 kind: DestinationRule metadata: name: sticky-sessions spec: host: my-service trafficPolicy: loadBalancer: consistentHash: httpHeaderName: x-user-id # or: httpCookie, useSourceIp, httpQueryParameterName ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Start simple** - Add complexity incrementally - **Use subsets** - Version your services clearly - **Set timeouts** - Always configure reasonable timeouts - **Enable retries** - But with backoff and limits - **Monitor** - Use Kiali and Jaeger for visibility ### Don'ts - **Don't over-retry** - Can cause cascading failures - **Don't ignore outlier detection** - Enable circuit breakers - **Don't mirror to production** - Mirror to test environments - **Don't skip canary** - Test with small traffic percentage first ## Debugging Commands ```bash # Check VirtualService configuration istioctl analyze # View effective routes istioctl proxy-config routes deploy/my-app -o json # Check endpoint discovery istioctl proxy-config endpoints deploy/my-app # Debug traffic istioctl proxy-config log deploy/my-app --level debug ``` ## Resources - [Istio Traffic Management](https://istio.io/latest/docs/concepts/traffic-management/) - [Virtual Service Reference](https://istio.io/latest/docs/reference/config/networking/virtual-service/) - [Destination Rule Reference](https://istio.io/latest/docs/reference/config/networking/destination-rule/)
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

screen-reader-testing

Test web applications with screen readers including VoiceOver,

coding
⭐1
# Screen Reader Testing Practical guide to testing web applications with screen readers for comprehensive accessibility validation. ## When to Use This Skill - Validating screen reader compatibility - Testing ARIA implementations - Debugging assistive technology issues - Verifying form accessibility - Testing dynamic content announcements - Ensuring navigation accessibility ## Core Concepts ### 1. Major Screen Readers | Screen Reader | Platform | Browser | Usage | | ------------- | --------- | -------------- | ----- | | **VoiceOver** | macOS/iOS | Safari | ~15% | | **NVDA** | Windows | Firefox/Chrome | ~31% | | **JAWS** | Windows | Chrome/IE | ~40% | | **TalkBack** | Android | Chrome | ~10% | | **Narrator** | Windows | Edge | ~4% | ### 2. Testing Priority ``` Minimum Coverage: 1. NVDA + Firefox (Windows) 2. VoiceOver + Safari (macOS) 3. VoiceOver + Safari (iOS) Comprehensive Coverage: + JAWS + Chrome (Windows) + TalkBack + Chrome (Android) + Narrator + Edge (Windows) ``` ### 3. Screen Reader Modes | Mode | Purpose | When Used | | ------------------ | ---------------------- | ----------------- | | **Browse/Virtual** | Read content | Default reading | | **Focus/Forms** | Interact with controls | Filling forms | | **Application** | Custom widgets | ARIA applications | ## VoiceOver (macOS) ### Setup ``` Enable: System Preferences β†’ Accessibility β†’ VoiceOver Toggle: Cmd + F5 Quick Toggle: Triple-press Touch ID ``` ### Essential Commands ``` Navigation: VO = Ctrl + Option (VoiceOver modifier) VO + Right Arrow Next element VO + Left Arrow Previous element VO + Shift + Down Enter group VO + Shift + Up Exit group Reading: VO + A Read all from cursor Ctrl Stop speaking VO + B Read current paragraph Interaction: VO + Space Activate element VO + Shift + M Open menu Tab Next focusable element Shift + Tab Previous focusable element Rotor (VO + U): Navigate by: Headings, Links, Forms, Landmarks Left/Right Arrow Change rotor category Up/Down Arrow Navigate within category Enter Go to item Web Specific: VO + Cmd + H Next heading VO + Cmd + J Next form control VO + Cmd + L Next link VO + Cmd + T Next table ``` ### Testing Checklist ```markdown ## VoiceOver Testing Checklist ### Page Load - [ ] Page title announced - [ ] Main landmark found - [ ] Skip link works ### Navigation - [ ] All headings discoverable via rotor - [ ] Heading levels logical (H1 β†’ H2 β†’ H3) - [ ] Landmarks properly labeled - [ ] Skip links functional ### Links & Buttons - [ ] Link purpose clear - [ ] Button actions described - [ ] New window/tab announced ### Forms - [ ] All labels read with inputs - [ ] Required fields announced - [ ] Error messages read - [ ] Instructions available - [ ] Focus moves to errors ### Dynamic Content - [ ] Alerts announced immediately - [ ] Loading states communicated - [ ] Content updates announced - [ ] Modals trap focus correctly ### Tables - [ ] Headers associated with cells - [ ] Table navigation works - [ ] Complex tables have captions ``` ### Common Issues & Fixes ```html <!-- Issue: Button not announcing purpose --> <button><svg>...</svg></button> <!-- Fix --> <button aria-label="Close dialog"><svg aria-hidden="true">...</svg></button> <!-- Issue: Dynamic content not announced --> <div id="results">New results loaded</div> <!-- Fix --> <div id="results" role="status" aria-live="polite">New results loaded</div> <!-- Issue: Form error not read --> <input type="email" /> <span class="error">Invalid email</span> <!-- Fix --> <input type="email" aria-invalid="true" aria-describedby="email-error" /> <span id="email-error" role="alert">Invalid email</span> ``` ## NVDA (Windows) ### Setup ``` Download: nvaccess.org Start: Ctrl + Alt + N Stop: Insert + Q ``` ### Essential Commands ``` Navigation: Insert = NVDA modifier Down Arrow Next line Up Arrow Previous line Tab Next focusable Shift + Tab Previous focusable Reading: NVDA + Down Arrow Say all Ctrl Stop speech NVDA + Up Arrow Current line Headings: H Next heading Shift + H Previous heading 1-6 Heading level 1-6 Forms: F Next form field B Next button E Next edit field X Next checkbox C Next combo box Links: K Next link U Next unvisited link V Next visited link Landmarks: D Next landmark Shift + D Previous landmark Tables: T Next table Ctrl + Alt + Arrows Navigate cells Elements List (NVDA + F7): Shows all links, headings, form fields, landmarks ``` ### Browse vs Focus Mode ``` NVDA automatically switches modes: - Browse Mode: Arrow keys navigate content - Focus Mode: Arrow keys control interactive elements Manual switch: NVDA + Space Watch for: - "Browse mode" announcement when navigating - "Focus mode" when entering form fields - Application role forces forms mode ``` ### Testing Script ```markdown ## NVDA Test Script ### Initial Load 1. Navigate to page 2. Let page finish loading 3. Press Insert + Down to read all 4. Note: Page title, main content identified? ### Landmark Navigation 1. Press D repeatedly 2. Check: All main areas reachable? 3. Check: Landmarks properly labeled? ### Heading Navigation 1. Press Insert + F7 β†’ Headings 2. Check: Logical heading structure? 3. Press H to navigate headings 4. Check: All sections discoverable? ### Form Testing 1. Press F to find first form field 2. Check: Label read? 3. Fill in invalid data 4. Submit form 5. Check: Errors announced? 6. Check: Focus moved to error? ### Interactive Elements 1. Tab through all interactive elements 2. Check: Each announces role and state 3. Activate buttons with Enter/Space 4. Check: Result announced? ### Dynamic Content 1. Trigger content update 2. Check: Change announced? 3. Open modal 4. Check: Focus trapped? 5. Close modal 6. Check: Focus returns? ``` ## JAWS (Windows) ### Essential Commands ``` Start: Desktop shortcut or Ctrl + Alt + J Virtual Cursor: Auto-enabled in browsers Navigation: Arrow keys Navigate content Tab Next focusable Insert + Down Read all Ctrl Stop speech Quick Keys: H Next heading T Next table F Next form field B Next button G Next graphic L Next list ; Next landmark Forms Mode: Enter Enter forms mode Numpad + Exit forms mode F5 List form fields Lists: Insert + F7 Link list Insert + F6 Heading list Insert + F5 Form field list Tables: Ctrl + Alt + Arrows Table navigation ``` ## TalkBack (Android) ### Setup ``` Enable: Settings β†’ Accessibility β†’ TalkBack Toggle: Hold both volume buttons 3 seconds ``` ### Gestures ``` Explore: Drag finger across screen Next: Swipe right Previous: Swipe left Activate: Double tap Scroll: Two finger swipe Reading Controls (swipe up then right): - Headings - Links - Controls - Characters - Words - Lines - Paragraphs ``` ## Common Test Scenarios ### 1. Modal Dialog ```html <!-- Accessible modal structure --> <div role="dialog" aria-modal="true" aria-labelledby="dialog-title" aria-describedby="dialog-desc" > <h2 id="dialog-title">Confirm Delete</h2> <p id="dialog-desc">This action cannot be undone.</p> <button>Cancel</button> <button>Delete</button> </div> ``` ```javascript // Focus management function openModal(modal) { // Store last focused element lastFocus = document.activeElement; // Move focus to modal modal.querySelector("h2").focus(); // Trap focus modal.addEventListener("keydown", trapFocus); } function closeModal(modal) { // Return focus lastFocus.focus(); } function trapFocus(e) { if (e.key === "Tab") { const focusable = modal.querySelectorAll( 'button, [href], input, select, textarea, [tabindex]:not([tabindex="-1"])', ); const first = focusable[0]; const last = focusable[focusable.length - 1]; if (e.shiftKey && document.activeElement === first) { last.focus(); e.preventDefault(); } else if (!e.shiftKey && document.activeElement === last) { first.focus(); e.preventDefault(); } } if (e.key === "Escape") { closeModal(modal); } } ``` ### 2. Live Regions ```html <!-- Status messages (polite) --> <div role="status" aria-live="polite" aria-atomic="true"> <!-- Content updates will be announced after current speech --> </div> <!-- Alerts (assertive) --> <div role="alert" aria-live="assertive"> <!-- Content updates interrupt current speech --> </div> <!-- Progress updates --> <div role="progressbar" aria-valuenow="75" aria-valuemin="0" aria-valuemax="100" aria-label="Upload progress" ></div> <!-- Log (additions only) --> <div role="log" aria-live="polite" aria-relevant="additions"> <!-- New messages announced, removals not --> </div> ``` ### 3. Tab Interface ```html <div role="tablist" aria-label="Product information"> <button role="tab" id="tab-1" aria-selected="true" aria-controls="panel-1"> Description </button> <button role="tab" id="tab-2" aria-selected="false" aria-controls="panel-2" tabindex="-1" > Reviews </button> </div> <div role="tabpanel" id="panel-1" aria-labelledby="tab-1"> Product description content... </div> <div role="tabpanel" id="panel-2" aria-labelledby="tab-2" hidden> Reviews content... </div> ``` ```javascript // Tab keyboard navigation tablist.addEventListener("keydown", (e) => { const tabs = [...tablist.querySelectorAll('[role="tab"]')]; const index = tabs.indexOf(document.activeElement); let newIndex; switch (e.key) { case "ArrowRight": newIndex = (index + 1) % tabs.length; break; case "ArrowLeft": newIndex = (index - 1 + tabs.length) % tabs.length; break; case "Home": newIndex = 0; break; case "End": newIndex = tabs.length - 1; break; default: return; } tabs[newIndex].focus(); activateTab(tabs[newIndex]); e.preventDefault(); }); ``` ## Debugging Tips ```javascript // Log what screen reader sees function logAccessibleName(element) { const computed = window.getComputedStyle(element); console.log({ role: element.getAttribute("role") || element.tagName, name: element.getAttribute("aria-label") || element.getAttribute("aria-labelledby") || element.textContent, state: { expanded: element.getAttribute("aria-expanded"), selected: element.getAttribute("aria-selected"), checked: element.getAttribute("aria-checked"), disabled: element.disabled, }, visible: computed.display !== "none" && computed.visibility !== "hidden", }); } ``` ## Best Practices ### Do's - **Test with actual screen readers** - Not just simulators - **Use semantic HTML first** - ARIA is supplemental - **Test in browse and focus modes** - Different experiences - **Verify focus management** - Especially for SPAs - **Test keyboard only first** - Foundation for SR testing ### Don'ts - **Don't assume one SR is enough** - Test multiple - **Don't ignore mobile** - Growing user base - **Don't test only happy path** - Test error states - **Don't skip dynamic content** - Most common issues - **Don't rely on visual testing** - Different experience ## Resources - [VoiceOver User Guide](https://support.apple.com/guide/voiceover/welcome/mac) - [NVDA User Guide](https://www.nvaccess.org/files/nvda/documentation/userGuide.html) - [JAWS Documentation](https://support.freedomscientific.com/Products/Blindness/JAWS) - [WebAIM Screen Reader Survey](https://webaim.org/projects/screenreadersurvey/)
πŸ‘1
πŸ‘οΈ1
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

multi-reviewer-patterns

Coordinate parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions

coding
⭐1
# Multi-Reviewer Patterns Patterns for coordinating parallel code reviews across multiple quality dimensions, deduplicating findings, calibrating severity, and producing consolidated reports. ## When to Use This Skill - Organizing a multi-dimensional code review - Deciding which review dimensions to assign - Deduplicating findings from multiple reviewers - Calibrating severity ratings consistently - Producing a consolidated review report ## Review Dimension Allocation ### Available Dimensions | Dimension | Focus | When to Include | | ----------------- | --------------------------------------- | ------------------------------------------- | | **Security** | Vulnerabilities, auth, input validation | Always for code handling user input or auth | | **Performance** | Query efficiency, memory, caching | When changing data access or hot paths | | **Architecture** | SOLID, coupling, patterns | For structural changes or new modules | | **Testing** | Coverage, quality, edge cases | When adding new functionality | | **Accessibility** | WCAG, ARIA, keyboard nav | For UI/frontend changes | ### Recommended Combinations | Scenario | Dimensions | | ---------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | | API endpoint changes | Security, Performance, Architecture | | Frontend component | Architecture, Testing, Accessibility | | Database migration | Performance, Architecture | | Authentication changes | Security, Testing | | Full feature review | Security, Performance, Architecture, Testing | ## Finding Deduplication When multiple reviewers report issues at the same location: ### Merge Rules 1. **Same file:line, same issue** β€” Merge into one finding, credit all reviewers 2. **Same file:line, different issues** β€” Keep as separate findings 3. **Same issue, different locations** β€” Keep separate but cross-reference 4. **Conflicting severity** β€” Use the higher severity rating 5. **Conflicting recommendations** β€” Include both with reviewer attribution ### Deduplication Process ``` For each finding in all reviewer reports: 1. Check if another finding references the same file:line 2. If yes, check if they describe the same issue 3. If same issue: merge, keeping the more detailed description 4. If different issue: keep both, tag as "co-located" 5. Use highest severity among merged findings ``` ## Severity Calibration ### Severity Criteria | Severity | Impact | Likelihood | Examples | | ------------ | --------------------------------------------- | ---------------------- | -------------------------------------------- | | **Critical** | Data loss, security breach, complete failure | Certain or very likely | SQL injection, auth bypass, data corruption | | **High** | Significant functionality impact, degradation | Likely | Memory leak, missing validation, broken flow | | **Medium** | Partial impact, workaround exists | Possible | N+1 query, missing edge case, unclear error | | **Low** | Minimal impact, cosmetic | Unlikely | Style issue, minor optimization, naming | ### Calibration Rules - Security vulnerabilities exploitable by external users: always Critical or High - Performance issues in hot paths: at least Medium - Missing tests for critical paths: at least Medium - Accessibility violations for core functionality: at least Medium - Code style issues with no functional impact: Low ## Consolidated Report Template ```markdown ## Code Review Report **Target**: {files/PR/directory} **Reviewers**: {dimension-1}, {dimension-2}, {dimension-3} **Date**: {date} **Files Reviewed**: {count} ### Critical Findings ({count}) #### [CR-001] {Title} **Location**: `{file}:{line}` **Dimension**: {Security/Performance/etc.} **Description**: {what was found} **Impact**: {what could happen} **Fix**: {recommended remediation} ### High Findings ({count}) ... ### Medium Findings ({count}) ... ### Low Findings ({count}) ... ### Summary | Dimension | Critical | High | Medium | Low | Total | | ------------ | -------- | ----- | ------ | ----- | ------ | | Security | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 6 | | Performance | 0 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 7 | | Architecture | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 | | **Total** | **1** | **3** | **9** | **5** | **18** | ### Recommendation {Overall assessment and prioritized action items} ```
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ1
πŸ€– Auto-discovered
πŸ€–system promptβ€’7 months ago

context-driven-development

Creates and maintains project context artifacts (product.md,

coding
⭐1
# Context-Driven Development Guide for implementing and maintaining context as a managed artifact alongside code, enabling consistent AI interactions and team alignment through structured project documentation. ## When to Use This Skill - Setting up new projects with Conductor - Understanding the relationship between context artifacts - Maintaining consistency across AI-assisted development sessions - Onboarding team members to an existing Conductor project - Deciding when to update context documents - Managing greenfield vs brownfield project contexts ## Core Philosophy Context-Driven Development treats project context as a first-class artifact managed alongside code. Instead of relying on ad-hoc prompts or scattered documentation, establish a persistent, structured foundation that informs all AI interactions. Key principles: 1. **Context precedes code**: Define what you're building and how before implementation 2. **Living documentation**: Context artifacts evolve with the project 3. **Single source of truth**: One canonical location for each type of information 4. **AI alignment**: Consistent context produces consistent AI behavior ## The Workflow Follow the **Context β†’ Spec & Plan β†’ Implement** workflow: 1. **Context Phase**: Establish or verify project context artifacts exist and are current 2. **Specification Phase**: Define requirements and acceptance criteria for work units 3. **Planning Phase**: Break specifications into phased, actionable tasks 4. **Implementation Phase**: Execute tasks following established workflow patterns ## Artifact Relationships ### product.md - Defines WHAT and WHY Purpose: Captures product vision, goals, target users, and business context. Contents: - Product name and one-line description - Problem statement and solution approach - Target user personas - Core features and capabilities - Success metrics and KPIs - Product roadmap (high-level) Update when: - Product vision or goals change - New major features are planned - Target audience shifts - Business priorities evolve ### product-guidelines.md - Defines HOW to Communicate Purpose: Establishes brand voice, messaging standards, and communication patterns. Contents: - Brand voice and tone guidelines - Terminology and glossary - Error message conventions - User-facing copy standards - Documentation style Update when: - Brand guidelines change - New terminology is introduced - Communication patterns need refinement ### tech-stack.md - Defines WITH WHAT Purpose: Documents technology choices, dependencies, and architectural decisions. Contents: - Primary languages and frameworks - Key dependencies with versions - Infrastructure and deployment targets - Development tools and environment - Testing frameworks - Code quality tools Update when: - Adding new dependencies - Upgrading major versions - Changing infrastructure - Adopting new tools or patterns ### workflow.md - Defines HOW to Work Purpose: Establishes development practices, quality gates, and team workflows. Contents: - Development methodology (TDD, etc.) - Git workflow and commit conventions - Code review requirements - Testing requirements and coverage targets - Quality assurance gates - Deployment procedures Update when: - Team practices evolve - Quality standards change - New workflow patterns are adopted ### tracks.md - Tracks WHAT'S HAPPENING Purpose: Registry of all work units with status and metadata. Contents: - Active tracks with current status - Completed tracks with completion dates - Track metadata (type, priority, assignee) - Links to individual track directories Update when: - New tracks are created - Track status changes - Tracks are completed or archived See [references/artifact-templates.md](references/artifact-templates.md) for copy-paste starter templates. ## Context Maintenance Principles ### Keep Artifacts Synchronized Ensure changes in one artifact reflect in related documents: - New feature in product.md β†’ Update tech-stack.md if new dependencies needed - Completed track β†’ Update product.md to reflect new capabilities - Workflow change β†’ Update all affected track plans ### Update tech-stack.md When Adding Dependencies Before adding any new dependency: 1. Check if existing dependencies solve the need 2. Document the rationale for new dependencies 3. Add version constraints 4. Note any configuration requirements ### Update product.md When Features Complete After completing a feature track: 1. Move feature from "planned" to "implemented" in product.md 2. Update any affected success metrics 3. Document any scope changes from original plan ### Verify Context Before Implementation Before starting any track: 1. Read all context artifacts 2. Flag any outdated information 3. Propose updates before proceeding 4. Confirm context accuracy with stakeholders ## Greenfield vs Brownfield Handling ### Greenfield Projects (New) For new projects: 1. Run `/conductor:setup` to create all artifacts interactively 2. Answer questions about product vision, tech preferences, and workflow 3. Generate initial style guides for chosen languages 4. Create empty tracks registry Characteristics: - Full control over context structure - Define standards before code exists - Establish patterns early ### Brownfield Projects (Existing) For existing codebases: 1. Run `/conductor:setup` with existing codebase detection 2. System analyzes existing code, configs, and documentation 3. Pre-populate artifacts based on discovered patterns 4. Review and refine generated context Characteristics: - Extract implicit context from existing code - Reconcile existing patterns with desired patterns - Document technical debt and modernization plans - Preserve working patterns while establishing standards ## Benefits ### Team Alignment - New team members onboard faster with explicit context - Consistent terminology and conventions across the team - Shared understanding of product goals and technical decisions ### AI Consistency - AI assistants produce aligned outputs across sessions - Reduced need to re-explain context in each interaction - Predictable behavior based on documented standards ### Institutional Memory - Decisions and rationale are preserved - Context survives team changes - Historical context informs future decisions ### Quality Assurance - Standards are explicit and verifiable - Deviations from context are detectable - Quality gates are documented and enforceable ## Directory Structure ``` conductor/ β”œβ”€β”€ index.md # Navigation hub linking all artifacts β”œβ”€β”€ product.md # Product vision and goals β”œβ”€β”€ product-guidelines.md # Communication standards β”œβ”€β”€ tech-stack.md # Technology preferences β”œβ”€β”€ workflow.md # Development practices β”œβ”€β”€ tracks.md # Work unit registry β”œβ”€β”€ setup_state.json # Resumable setup state β”œβ”€β”€ code_styleguides/ # Language-specific conventions β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ python.md β”‚ β”œβ”€β”€ typescript.md β”‚ └── ... └── tracks/ └── <track-id>/ β”œβ”€β”€ spec.md β”œβ”€β”€ plan.md β”œβ”€β”€ metadata.json └── index.md ``` ## Context Lifecycle 1. **Creation**: Initial setup via `/conductor:setup` 2. **Validation**: Verify before each track 3. **Evolution**: Update as project grows 4. **Synchronization**: Keep artifacts aligned 5. **Archival**: Document historical decisions ## Context Validation Checklist Before starting implementation on any track, validate context: ### Product Context - [ ] product.md reflects current product vision - [ ] Target users are accurately described - [ ] Feature list is up to date - [ ] Success metrics are defined ### Technical Context - [ ] tech-stack.md lists all current dependencies - [ ] Version numbers are accurate - [ ] Infrastructure targets are correct - [ ] Development tools are documented ### Workflow Context - [ ] workflow.md describes current practices - [ ] Quality gates are defined - [ ] Coverage targets are specified - [ ] Commit conventions are documented ### Track Context - [ ] tracks.md shows all active work - [ ] No stale or abandoned tracks - [ ] Dependencies between tracks are noted ## Common Anti-Patterns Avoid these context management mistakes: ### Stale Context Problem: Context documents become outdated and misleading. Solution: Update context as part of each track's completion process. ### Context Sprawl Problem: Information scattered across multiple locations. Solution: Use the defined artifact structure; resist creating new document types. ### Implicit Context Problem: Relying on knowledge not captured in artifacts. Solution: If you reference something repeatedly, add it to the appropriate artifact. ### Context Hoarding Problem: One person maintains context without team input. Solution: Review context artifacts in pull requests; make updates collaborative. ### Over-Specification Problem: Context becomes so detailed it's impossible to maintain. Solution: Keep artifacts focused on decisions that affect AI behavior and team alignment. ## Integration with Development Tools ### IDE Integration Configure your IDE to display context files prominently: - Pin conductor/product.md for quick reference - Add tech-stack.md to project notes - Create snippets for common patterns from style guides ### Git Hooks Consider pre-commit hooks that: - Warn when dependencies change without tech-stack.md update - Remind to update product.md when feature branches merge - Validate context artifact syntax ### CI/CD Integration Include context validation in pipelines: - Check tech-stack.md matches actual dependencies - Verify links in context documents resolve - Ensure tracks.md status matches git branch state ## Session Continuity Conductor supports multi-session development through context persistence: ### Starting a New Session 1. Read index.md to orient yourself 2. Check tracks.md for active work 3. Review relevant track's plan.md for current task 4. Verify context artifacts are current ### Ending a Session 1. Update plan.md with current progress 2. Note any blockers or decisions made 3. Commit in-progress work with clear status 4. Update tracks.md if status changed ### Handling Interruptions If interrupted mid-task: 1. Mark task as `[~]` with note about stopping point 2. Commit work-in-progress to feature branch 3. Document any uncommitted decisions in plan.md ## Best Practices 1. **Read context first**: Always read relevant artifacts before starting work 2. **Small updates**: Make incremental context changes, not massive rewrites 3. **Link decisions**: Reference context when making implementation choices 4. **Version context**: Commit context changes alongside code changes 5. **Review context**: Include context artifact reviews in code reviews 6. **Validate regularly**: Run context validation checklist before major work 7. **Communicate changes**: Notify team when context artifacts change significantly 8. **Preserve history**: Use git to track context evolution over time 9. **Question staleness**: If context feels wrong, investigate and update 10. **Keep it actionable**: Every context item should inform a decision or behavior
πŸ‘0
πŸ‘οΈ0
πŸ€– Auto-discovered